According to Rosenau and, et al. (1992), is not equivalent to government even though they both attribute to determined act, resourceful actions, systematicity of having principles: government is assisted by a formal force, such as the “police” regardless of occasions with lack of the requirements to have an authority force or not. Rosenau defines governance as “systems of rule at all levels of human activity -from the family to the international organisation in which the pursuit of goals through the exercise of control has transnational repercussions.” Governance may be explained with the grasp to administrative institutions, just like government, but with inclusion of non-governmental organisations and persons among their needs and desires fulfilled autogenously. Governance could be further explained as “order plus intentionality”. (Rosenau and Czempiel 1992)

Rosenau explains “regime” in similarity with governance but not quite the same. Regime is a provision, “as sets of implicit or explicit principles, norms, rules, and decision-making -procedures around which actors’ expectations converge” (Rosenau and Czempiel 1992; Aggarwal and Krasner 1984; Krasner 1983). Although, this quote gives a hindsight about regime being commensurate to governance in the global order, the two are significantly distant from each other. Rosenau explains regimes to be more “issue-based”. E.g. precise activities: whaling, conservation of polar bears. In contrast to international regime; international order is defined as a sets of rule and an expansive plan of arrangements for all international society”.

According to Rosenau and, et al. (1992), there are three basic stages that can sustain global order: 1) Ideational or inter-subjective -which would be explained as morals, values, beliefs and, etc. that help the viewing of political events of the world. 2) Behavioural and objective level of the routine of people considering the overcoming of global order. 3) The aggregate and political level in which the governance appears, regimes and institutions with the order act out and apply the policies deep rooted in the ideational and behavioural patterns, that are previously mentioned.

^[1]

^[2]