I am a high school graduate that loves to play sports, hangout with friends, and watch movies with my friends and girlfriend. I also really enjoy watching professional basketball games with my dad, we like to travel around to different states to watch our favorite teams play and compete. My favorite player is Kevin Durant and he plays for the Phoenix Suns. Kevin was a basketball prodigy as a youth and quickly became of the best prospects to come out of the Washington D.C area. ^[1]

If I keep up my involvement here on Wikipedia, I am going to edit pages on sports such as basketball, and golf, I think my knowledge on both of these super enjoyable sports would help people learn more about them and hopefully become as passionate as I am. I would also enjoy editing pages on different animals and insects, I find animals very interesting and would like to help people learn more about them and their habitats.

I have always loved riding in little planes and flying over little towns and seeing them from high in the sky, I think that is what sparked my interest in Harvey Airfield. I would like to see wikipedia have the best coverage of Harvey Airfield ever and in order for that to happen I realized that I would have to chip in and help so I visited the Harvey Airfield article on Wikipedia , and found three aspects of it worth commenting on: Its good overall info, its lack of citations, and it's lack of information that should be in the article.

I really enjoyed reading the Harvey Airfield article, I thought that the information that they brought forth was very good. I really liked how they made sure to add in the history of the airfield so that people can know how important this place has been for the town of Snohomish. I also think that bringing forth the history of the airfield shows how much respect people have for the Harvey name.

I was surprised when I looked at this article because their are hardly any citations, from looking at and reading other articles this one doesn't even compare when it comes to amount of citations. I feel like there were very important words and places that weren't cited. I also would have cited some of the recurring words over again, I think it makes it easier for readers to just click on the location right when they're reading it compared to reading it and then having to go all the way back up to the top of the article to click on the citation

When I say lack of information I mean more along the lines of the length of the article, I know this point can sound a little confusing because I just that the article had good overall info. When it comes to an airfield that has been around for 100 plus years, you would think that there would be more information on it then what is in that article. I would put more information on the planes if I was going to add on to this article.

Overall, I'd rate this article as "Pretty good." Like I said before I thought the information that was given was really good and well thought out. Given that fact there wasn't a lot of citations and even thought the information that was given was good, there wasn't a lot of it. I thought they could have said a lot more about the airfield and the planes that fly out of it. Lastly I think for an airfield that has been around for 100 plus years you can write more about it then half of a page.