This article may lack focus or may be about more than one topic. Please help improve this article, possibly by splitting the article and/or by introducing a disambiguation page, or discuss this issue on the talk page.(January 2023)
[T]he real in itself is meaningless: it has no truth for human existence. In Lacan's terms, it is speech that "introduces the dimension of truth into the real."[7]
Complete understanding, as in [,on the one hand,] the resolution after the period of mourning, represents [,on the other hand,] clear arrival at the Spinozan “impossible”.[23]
— Ian S. Miller
Even the word 'trace' is an appropriation of the real. [...] ' Writing is one of the representatives of the trace in general, it is not the trace itself. The trace itself does not exist [Derrida’s italics]. [...] (OG: 167, my italics)'[.][24]
Felluga states that Bill Brown's Thing is conceptually close to the Real, as it is a type of unreliableness of the relation between subject and object that is neither subject nor object.[29]
The Real is reality in its unmediated form. It is what disrupts the subject’s received notions about himself and the world around him. [...] as a shattering enigma, because in order to make sense of it he or she will have to [...] find signifiers that can ensure its control.[30]
Felluga states that Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe's term antagonism, as a societal limit that sits outside of society's articulation, functions similarly to the Real.[51]
The crucial difficulty in self-analysis lies not in these fields but in the emotional factors that blind us to unconscious forces. That the main difficulty is emotional rather than intellectual is confirmed by the fact that when analysts analyze themselves they have not such a great advantage over the layman as we would be inclined to believe.[55][54]
Barthes reflects that the inner voice of the subject is structured in a triad of "Presence" (frustration) created by the maternal Other, "Intermittence" (castration anxiety) over the loss of the phallus as an imaginary object taken by the real father, and "Absence" (privation) that occurs from losing the phallus from the imaginary father; (symbolicdesire separates from realneed and becomes imaginarydemand) (q.v., Lacan's graph of desire).[65][66][67][68]
Hurst argues that the Lacanian Real parallels Derrida's concept of différance.[69] Lewis states that lalangue is the arche-writing repetition that reveals the real subject through différance.[70] Guattari states that temporal différance is secreted from obsessional neurosis.[71]
The three categories of hysteria — conversion hysteria, anxiety hysteria, and traumatic hysteria — have a basis in alienation, with an identification to those-without-the-phallus, and a self-sacrifice through displacement.[76] Hurst states that masculine libidinal hysteria breaches the paranoid-schizoid position of masculine fanaticism by attempting to make the Real appear, whereas feminine libidinal hysteria breaches the Nietzschean radical nihilism of Hegel's "eternal irony" by resisting the Symbolic Order.[77]
Artistic discourse is a pneuma of neurosis-psychosis hallucinatory hysteria, a poetic-real microcosm of the True-Real.[78][79][80][81]
[T]he fantasm of a devouring orality or of a return to the maternal breast refers to a mother who is neither real, imaginary, nor symbolic but who is cosmic becoming; it is a Universe of processual emergence as much as of abolition. For all that, we are not in the reign of Jungian universal Imagos or mythological entities such as Gaia or Chronos. The Universes of which the mouth and the breast are the refrain-operators are constellated in a composite and heterogenetic way: they constitute singular events.[82]
The artist's sense of truth. [...] he does not want to give up the most effective presuppositions of his art: the fantastic, mythical, uncertain, extreme, the sense for the symbolic, the overestimation of the person, the faith in some miraculous element in the genius.[83]
These objects a take shape as the consequence of repressions, disguises, dissociations, fragmentations, deflections, intellectualizations, reductions, displacements, and discussions, which [...] cover over, and point to, the fact that the traumatic event cannot be assimilated [...] The Real [...] "appears" as failures, ruptures, and inconsistencies caused by the tuché.[85]
— Andrea Hurst
Tuché is an Aristotelian-borrowed term to describe the traumatic encounter-kernel of the Real and automaton to describe the repetitive transference process of symbolizing the Real.[86][87]
Although the encircling of the Real (Lacan) or constellations (Adorno) tells us that we can never truly grasp the object, our approaching it from different angles of contextual perspectives takes place through a thinking subject who draws on concepts.[88]
— Claudia Leeb
The Symbolic introduces "a cut in the Real" in the process of signification: "it is the world of words that creates the world of things." Thus the Real emerges as that which is outside language, making it "that which resists symbolization absolutely".[89] The logos of the Symbolic creates the Order of the Real; the Real and kairos divide the logos, resist symbolization, and anticipate being symbolized.[94]
[T]he real[...]is always in its place[...][the symbolic] carries it glued to its [metaphorical shoe] heel[.][104] [...] The real is without fissure.[105] [...] There is no absence [orpleasure principle ] in the real [, concerning Freud's reality principle ].[106]
Suicide is really intended as egocide. [...] if one loses this sense of connectedness [to other egos] [...] the foundation of interconnectedness, is described as 'empty' or 'nothing,' and at the same time as an infinite, 'non-empty' world.[119]
The unreal-unnameable organ called a lamella (or libido as a symbiotic, pre-Oedipal, pre-symbolic Real(1) before-signified-who-ness) is distinct from the Real(2) after-signifier-what-ness, which a subject experiences at the limits of the Imaginary and Symbolic.[127] Real(1) is a continuous, "whole" reality that is undivided by language, while Real(2) is the space of the possibility of abjection being raised wherever there is interference in the path of the object of the ego, including the experience of surplus jouissance which threatens to surpass a subject's boundaries; Kristeva remarks that this experience "takes the ego back to its source", i.e., the id.[107][124][128]
[O]bject shadows or things of emergence—contents of the first Yonder from which a first Here conceives itself [...] Objects that, like those we have named, are not objects because they have no subject-like counterpart, are referred to by Macho as "nobjects": they are spherically surrounding mini-conditions envisaged by a non-facing self, namely the fetal pre-subject[.][129]
Lacan finds in this sublimated image [of the object-as-Thing] the function of an Até, the 'divinization' of a 'limit' that simultaneously draws us toward and keeps us a safe distance from that which 'represents the disqualification of all concepts,' that which represents the void of the 'empty' Real (262).[151]
The subject is always the missing signifier, the lack of a signifier, 'the subject is literally at his beginning the elision of a signifier as such, the missing signifier in the chain' (SVII:224). The barred subject, the essence of the human being of desire, can then only exist in the bar [of Signifier/signified].[152]
— Michael Lewis citing Lacan
In the ordinary way, the study of "real" (i.e. social) space is referred to specialists and their respective specialties — to geographers, town-planners, sociologists, et alii. As for knowledge of "true" (i.e. mental) space, it is supposed to fall within the province of the mathematicians and philosophers. Here we have a double or even multiple error. To begin with, the split between "real" and "true" serves only to avoid any confrontation between practice and theory, between lived experience and concepts, so that both sides of these dualities are distorted from the outset.[153]
Lacan links the processes of displacement with metonymy and those of condensation with metaphor. [...] the process of realization of the subject parallels the action of metaphor that displaces literal levels of meaning in its production of new meaning.[7]
— James DiCenso
When Pascal writes: the eternal silence of these infinite spaces terrifies me, he speaks as an unbeliever, not as a believer.[154]
The void is what the subject finds through interrogation of oneself. The subject existentially navigates an inward, metaphorical and vacuous desert or ocean, unguided by the psychoanalytic metaphor of God's "Original Presence".[160] Premodern philosophers also thought up a formless chora, a pre-universal "chaos", and the experience of horror vacui;[161] these conceptions of an unguided ego confronting the void informed psychoanalysis.[162] It prefigured Lacan's outline of how the subject-as-metaphor, later the analysand, encounters the Real and how this experience is slated in analysis to give rise to pathologies, particularly anxieties and traumas. In psychoanalysis, the subject appears either as transference, repression or as the barrier separating the signifier over the signified. Subjective experience is a paradoxicalextension inseparable from the experience of place, landscape, and body, which can be conveyed as utopia, dystopia, or pantheon.[171]
Philosophers reveal the Real engulfing the ego in a comparatively unfamiliar and defamiliarizing space, and the subject's dystonic feelings of confrontation. The geographical self as described in human geography, or alternatively the "makanthropos" as described by Schopenhauer, feels Cartesian anxiety, a confusion of certainty in reason, from the experience of this formless void.[176]
Consider Heidegger's example of the shoemaker's workshop as a totality of equipment—hammers, needles, and the like. The in-order-to "is constitutive for the equipment" [...] The toward-which of the equipment is the "work to be produced", (p. 99), in this case, shoes [and, ipso facto, shoe heels ].[177]
An impasse is the resistance between the real and the imaginary that affects the therapeutic alliance, wherein the client is at odds with the Transcendent Function of the therapist's mind as mediation to the Symbolic Order by way of the Signifier-as-God (i.e., discrepancy).[182] Analysis reveals the kernel at the core of the Real through resistance.[183] The finite ego resists the unconscious's infinite lattice of signifiers.[184]
[A] God is something one encounters in the real, inaccessible. It is indicated by what doesn’t deceive—anxiety. [...] God is the supreme Being. I equals Being.[185]
— Lacan
Lacan gave the name passe to the analysand's dualistic experience of uncertainty, becoming eclipsed and challenged by a subjective confrontation, that gives way to a feeling of certainty with the Real, e.g. in the temptation of Christ or the desolation of saints; it is "the moment of crisis in a speaking cure in which all subjectivity, the last imaginary residue [of the ego], all self-love falls away" and is replaced by acceptance from the analyst.[186][187][54][188]
There is a 'barrier' of repression between Signifiers (the unconscious mind: 'discourse of the Other') and the signified […] a 'chain' of signifiers is analogous to the 'rings of a necklace that is a ring in another necklace made of rings' […] 'The signifier is that which [paternal metaphor] represents a subject for another signifier'.[189][190][191][192]
The agony of breaking through personal limitations is the agony of spiritual growth. Art, literature, myth and cult, philosophy, and ascetic disciplines are instruments to help the individual past his limiting horizons into spheres of ever-expanding realization. [...] Finally, the mind breaks the bounding sphere of the cosmos to a realization of transcending all experience of form—all symbolizations, all divinities: a realization of the ineluctable void.[195]
The becoming produced under therapy sessions can lead to an ineffable and oceanic experience of the Thing (White interpreting Bion, Eigen, Ogden);[196] the analyst in the Bion school seeks to be an empty container, or empty subject of the void, of the client's projections.[197]
The experience of the Void is the unbeliever's mystic temptation, his possibility for prayer, his moment of plenitude. At our limits, a God appears, or something that serves his turn.[200][15]
What has been [, under primary repression,] foreclosed [via the un-barred subject's repudiation of the Name-of-the-Father and phallus] from the Symbolic[,] reappears in the Real.[207]
— Jacques Lacan
In my reading, a convergence occurs between Heidegger's term 'refusal' (Verweigerung) and the Freudian 'foreclosure' (Verwerfung).[208]
In this joiner, Lacan tells us, "the subject can achieve nothing but some form of psychosis or perversion," where this psychosis is marked precisely by a fullness, in the presences of the Real, that eliminates the dimension of desire and all subjective aspirations (301).[151]
— Sheldon George
One crucial way in which Derrida describes the real is as an 'event' (évenément, an eventuating or occurrence). The absolute outside of the text [or, the real other] was named by Derrida from the very start as 'the unnameable' (OG: 14). [...] [O]ne can see that any understanding of the real as presence and as a transcendental signified will import a determination from something that has resulted from the real into the real itself.[24]
[ Baruch Spinoza ] recognize[s] only three, orprimary, affects: joy, sadness, and desire [and Deleuze interprets desire as the "reflection, derivation, and correlation" of the set of ideas that represent "all power" that "is inseparable from a capacity for being affected"].[224][225]
In critical overviews of the work of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, the Real has been identified, particularly in readings of A Thousand Plateaus, as the plane of defamiliarized and deterritorialized empty signifiers that approach the uncanny valley, destroyed signs of an imploding gaze, and a-temporal semiotic black holes of faciality.[230] In both the construction and destruction of the "face", a system that "brings together a despotic wall of interconnected signifiers and passional black holes of subjective absorption", there is a split in subjectivity and a confrontation with the Real.[231] The uncanny, the plane of empty signifiers, is found in relations between intersections of the interior-self and exterior-Other, a "return of the repressed" as an eternal return of the path of the objet petit a that disturbs familiarity and further deterritorializes the subject.[232][233][234]
Guattari, who throughout the development of his philosophy was critical of Lacan, wrote in the 1979 essay "Logos or Abstract Machines?" that:
Glyn Daly also provided a further elaboration of Žižek's three modalities through his pre-established examples from pop culture:
The real Real is the hard limit that functions as the horrifying Thing (the Alien, Medusa's head, maelstrom and so on) - a shattering force of negation. The symbolic Real refers to the anonymous symbols and codes (scientific formulae, digitalisation, empty signifiers...) that function in an indifferent manner as the abstract "texture" onto which, or out of which, reality is constituted. In The Matrix, for example, the symbolic Real is given expression at the point where Neo perceives "reality" in terms of the abstract streams of digital output. In the contemporary world, Žižek argues that it is capital itself that provides this essential backdrop to our reality and as such represents the symbolic Real of our age. With the "imaginary real" we have precisely the (unsustainable) dimension of fantasmatic excess-negation that is explored in Flatliners. This is why cyberspace is such an ambiguous imaginary realm.[285]
Notable figures
For broader coverage of this topic, see Citationality.
^Shaviro, Steven (2014). "Noncorrelational Thought". The Universe of Things: on Speculative Realism. University of Minnesota Press. p. 109. ISBN978-0-8166-8926-2. [E]ven when correlationism does posit some sort of 'exteriority' to thought—the Kantian thing in itself, the phenomenological intentional object, or the Lacanian Real—this exteriority still remains 'relative to us...this space of exteriority is merely the space of what faces us, of what exists only as a correlate of our own existence'
^Dor, Joël (1999). Gurewich, Judith (ed.). The Clinical Lacan. Other Press. p. 23. ISBN978-1-892746-05-4. Editor's note: [...] The Real is reality in its unmediated form. It is what disrupts the subject's received notions about himself and the world around him [...] as a shattering enigma, because in order to make sense of it he or she will have to [...] find signifiers that can ensure its control.
^Zupančič, Alenka (2000). Ethics of the Real: Kant, Lacan. Verso. pp. 235–237. ISBN1-85984-218-6.
^Bristow, Daniel (2022). Schizostructuralism: Divisions in Structure, Surface, Temporality, Class. Routledge. p. 37. ISBN978-1-03-205872-6. On the infinity of the rings, it becomes clear here that it is only the Real that is truly infinite, in its homonomy.
^Kristeva, Julia (1983). "Within the Microcosm of 'The Talking Cure'". In Smith, Joseph H.; Kerrigan, William (eds.). Interpreting Lacan. Psychiatry and the Humanities. Vol. 6. Yale University Press. p. 35. ISBN978-0-300-13581-7. No matter how impossible the real might be, once it is made homogenous with lalangue, it finally becomes part of a topology with the imaginary and the symbolic, a part of that trinary hold from which nothing escapes, not even the 'hole,' since it too is part of the structure.
^Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (2002) [1945]. Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge Classcs. p. 35. ISBN0-415-27841-4. The miracle of consciousness consists in its bringing to light, through attention, phenomena which re-establish the unity of the object in a new dimension at the very moment when they destroy it. [...] [attention is] the active constitution of a new object which makes explicit and articulate what was until then presented as no more than an indeterminate horizon.
^Lacan, Jacques (2006) [1966]. "Presentation on Psychical Causality". Écrits. Translated by Fink, Bruce. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 130. ISBN978-0-393-32925-4. [T]here is no antimony whatsoever between the objects I perceive and my body, whose perception is constituted by a quite natural harmony with those objects.
^ abRicoeur, Paul (1970). "Book II: Analytic: Reading of Freud: Part III: EROS, THANTOS, ANANKE: 3. Interrogations: What is Reality?". Terry Lectures: Freud & Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. Translated by Savage, Denis. Yale University Press. pp. 324, 327. ISBN978-0-300-02189-9. [R]eality is first of all the opposite of fantasy—it is facts[...]it is the opposite of dreams, of hallucination[...]thus reality becomes the correlate of the consciousness, and then of the ego. [...] [R]eality has the same meaning at the end of Freud's life as it had at the beginning: reality is the world shorn of God.
^Thacker, Eugene (2010). In the Dust of this Planet. Vol. [Horror of Philosophy Vol. 1]. Zero Books. p. 30. ISBN978-1-84694-676-9. [T]he human can only understand the human by transforming it into an object to relate to (psychology, sociology), while the human can only relate to the objective world itself by transforming the world into something familiar, accessible, or intuited in human terms (biology, geology, cosmology).
^Boothby, Richard (2001). Freud as Philosopher: metapsychology after Lacan. Routledge. p. 60. ISBN0-415-92590-8. He [Merleau-Ponty] thus asserts that 'the philosophy of Freud is not a philosophy of the body but of the flesh—The Id, the unconscious—and the Ego (correlative) to be understood on the basis of the flesh' (The Visible and the Invisible, 270).
^ abcMuller, John P. (1983). "Language, Psychosis, and the Subject in Lacan". In Smith, Joseph H.; Kerrigan, William (eds.). Interpreting Lacan. Psychiatry and the Humanities. Vol. 6. Yale University Press. p. 28. ISBN978-0-300-13581-7. The real[...]is a kind of static whole as well as a kind of black hole void of internal relations. To 'live in the real' means then to experience not just 'loss of self' but an unbearable plenitude; the term 'jouissance' catches the ecstatic of it but not the horror.
^ abcBoothby, Richard (2001). Freud as Philosopher: metapsychology after Lacan. Routledge. p. 12. ISBN0-415-92590-8. As much an expression of the ineffable ground of the subject's own being as that of the world beyond it, the real escapes all representation, even as its indeterminate force may be encountered in the experience of the uncanny or evidenced in the effects of the trauma.
^Lewis, Michael (2008). "3 The real and the development of the imaginary". Derrida and Lacan: Another Writing. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 148–201. JSTOR10.3366/j.ctt1r2cj3.9. This real is what Derrida refers to as 'authenticity' or 'propriety'[.] [...] The real is presence or substance.
^Miller, Ian S. (2022). Clinical Spinoza: Integrating His Philosophy with Contemporary Therapeutic Practice. Psychoanalysis in a New Key Book Series. Routledge. p. 160. doi:10.4324/9781003246404-10. ISBN978-1-032-15934-8.
^Brisman, Susan Hawk; Brisman, Leslie (1980). "Lies against Solitude: Symbolic, Imaginary, and Real". In Smith, Joseph H. (ed.). The Literary Freud: Mechanisms of Defense and the Poetic Will. Psychiatry and the Humanities. Vol. 4. Yale University Press. p. 43. ISBN0-300-02405-3. Defining the real as a 'plenum', Lacan warns against fusing it with real in the ordinary sense of 'actual'[.]
^ abcLacan, Jacques (2006) [1966]. "Presentation on Psychical Causality". Écrits. Translated by Fink, Bruce. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 153. ISBN978-0-393-32925-4. It is...the passion of the soul par excellence, narcissism, that imposes its structure on all his desires[.] [...] In the encounter between body and mind, the soul appears as[...]the limit of the monad. [...] seeking to empty himself of all thoughts, advances in the shadowless gleam of imaginary space, abstaining from what will emerge from it, a dull mirror shows him a surface in which nothing is reflected. I think, therefore, that I can designate the imago as the true object of psychology[.]
^Felluga, Dino Franco (2015). Critical Theory: Key Concepts. Routledge. pp. 313–314. ISBN978-0-415-69565-7. ['T]he thing really names less an object than a particular subject-object relation.['] [...] 'an amorphous characteristic or a frankly irresolvable enigma['] [...] [']a certain limit or liminality, to hover over the threshold between nameable and unnameable, the figurable and unfigurable, the identifiable and unidentifiable' (4-5). Thing is thus at once that which is 'badly encountered' but also 'some thing not quite apprehended' (5), somehow outside of the relation of subject and object. [...] The Thing in this sense is close to Jacques Lacan's understanding of the Real, as Brown himself suggests (5).
^Dor, Joël (1999). Gurewich, Judith (ed.). The Clinical Lacan. Other Press. p. 23. ISBN978-1-892746-05-4. Editor's note
^Parker, Ian (2011). Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Revolutions in Subjectivity. Advancing Theory in Therapy. NY: Routledge. p. 115. ISBN978-0-415-45543-5. [N]arrative itself is a form of defense against this real (Laplanche 2003; Frosh 2007).
^Dulsster, Dries G. M. (2022). The Reign of Speech: On Applied Lacanian Psychoanalysis. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 73. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85596-3. ISBN978-3-030-85595-6. S1 [...] These master signifiers are understood to structure and organize the narratives, and indeed the lives, of a subject. [...] S2 refers to the whole body of signifiers by means of which knowledge or messages are communicated.
^Frye, Northrop (1973) [1957]. "Third Essay: Archetypal Criticism: Theory of Myths". Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton University Press. p. 136. ISBN0-691-01298-9. In terms of narrative, myth is the imitation of actions near or at the conceivable limits of desire.
^Debord, Guy (1992) [1967]. The Society of the Spectacle. Translated by Knabb, Ken. Bureau of Public Secrets. p. 69. ISBN978-0-939682-06-5. Myth is the unitary mental construct which guarantees that the cosmic order conforms with the order that this society has in fact already established within its frontiers.
^Morson, Gary Saul (1993). "Strange Synchronies and Surplus Possibilities: Bakhtin on Time". Slavic Review. 52 (3). Cambridge University Press: 477–493. doi:10.2307/2499720. JSTOR2499720. S2CID147078360. Retrieved 2022-02-13. Generally speaking, literary structure is not neutral with respect to philosophies of time. It strongly favors closed temporalities. It is therefore comparatively easy and common to make the shape of a work reinforce a fatalistic or deterministic view of time [...] Such repetitions happen forward, not backward, and they require no underlying structure; but once they happen, they can always be narrated as if a plan were simply revealed over time. In fact, the conventions of narrative favor such a presentation, because narratives are told after the fact. To repeat: narratives are predisposed to understanding in terms of structure.
^Merrifield, Andrew (26 June 1993). "Place and Space: A Lefebvrian Reconciliation". Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 18 (4). The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers): 516–531. Bibcode:1993TrIBG..18..516M. doi:10.2307/622564. ISSN0020-2754. JSTOR622564. Retrieved 2022-02-13. Drawing upon French philosopher and literary critic, Paul Ricoeur, [J. Nicholas] Entrikin argues that the key element straddling this relationship — or 'getting between' place — is the process of emplotment (25). This is a form of narrative which gives structure to the particular connections people have with places [...] But all of this begins with a tacit assumption that place is dualistic to begin with
^Mutnick, Deborah (2006). "Time and Space in Composition Studies: 'Through the Gates of the Chronotope'". Rhetoric Review. 25 (1): 41–57. doi:10.1207/s15327981rr2501_3. JSTOR20176698. S2CID145482670. Retrieved 2022-02-13. A text, writes Bakhtin, occupies 'a certain specific place in space [...and] our acquaintance with it occurs through time' (252). [...] In Bakhtin's words: 'Time, as it were, thickens, takes on flesh, becomes artistically visible; likewise, space becomes charged and responsive to the movements of time, plot and history' (84).
^Deleuze, Gilles; Guattari, Félix (2009) [1965]. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Hurley, Robert; Seem, Mark; Lane R., Helen. Penguin Books. p. 128. ISBN978-0-14-310582-4. [W]hat remains common to Freud and Jung: the unconscious [is] always measured against myths[.]
^Lewis, Michael (2008). "1 Lacan: The name-of-the-father and the phallus". Derrida and Lacan: Another Writing. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 16–79. ISBN9780748636037. JSTOR10.3366/j.ctt1r2cj3.7. A myth is a symbolic or imaginary retelling of a beginning. A myth is something that the symbolic order finds it necessary to invoke in order to explain itself. [...] 'All myth is related to that which is inexplicable in the real' (SVIII: 67-8; cf. SVII: 143).
^Guattari, Félix (2006) [1992]. Chaosmosis: an ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Translated by Bains, Paul; Pefanis, Julian. Power Publications. p. 61. ISBN978-0-909952-25-9. It is only through mythical narratives (religious, fantasmatic, etc.) that the existential function accedes to discourse.
^Guilfoyle, Michael (2014). The Person in Narrative Therapy: A Post-Structural, Foucauldian Account. Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 58. ISBN978-1-349-47928-3. Discourses align our social activities by shaping us into all manner of historically specific, socially recognizable, and culturally relevant forms: [list of roles]. [...] stories 'are directly constitutive of life' [...] and of identity.
^Lewis, Michael (2008). "1 Lacan: The name-of-the-father and the phallus". Derrida and Lacan: Another Writing. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 16–79. ISBN9780748636037. JSTOR10.3366/j.ctt1r2cj3.7. The subject is singularity, the ego is individuality; the subject is real, the ego imaginary. [...] Singularity must leave itself, become alienated, in order to form our individuality. The ego represses the subject. [...] [A]dapting a term of Ernest Jones', ' aphanisis ' (cf. SIX: 4/4/62). This is used to describe the subject's characteristic of vanishing the moment it expresses itself [...] in which the real is 'present' within the symbolic order[.]
^Hurst, Andrea (2008). "11 The Death Drive and Ethical Action". Derrida Vis-à-vis Lacan: Interweaving Deconstruction and Psychoanalysis. Fordham University Press. pp. 318–347. ISBN9780823228744. JSTORj.ctt13x0dc2.19. On the one hand, in the register of the Imaginary, what is called the subject's 'identity' consists in the narrative fiction built up for the ego or moi. [...] On the other hand, in the register of the Real, that which I 'am' consists of an unconscious, traumatic, singularizing desire.
^McWilliams, Nancy (2020) [2011]. Psychoanalytic Diagnosis: Understanding Personality Structure in the Clinical Process (2 ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press. pp. 27–28. ISBN978-1462543694. The 'id' [...] [c]ognitively, it is preverbal, expressing itself in images and symbols. It is also prelogical, having no concept of time, mortality, limitation, or the impossibility that opposites can coexist. [...] 'primary process' thought. [...] The id is entirely unconscious.
^Karen, Horney (1939). New Ways in Psychoanalysis. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 184. ISBN978-0-393-31230-0. Freud's 'ego' [...] declared in some writings, the organized part of the 'id,' the latter being the sum total of crude, unmodified instinctual needs.
^Hurst, Andrea (2008). "12 The "Talking Cure": Language and Psychoanalysis". Derrida Vis-à-vis Lacan: Interweaving Deconstruction and Psychoanalysis. Fordham University Press. pp. 348–372. ISBN9780823228744. JSTORj.ctt13x0dc2.20. [T]he Real and the Imaginary may be understood in terms of the relation between the so-called pure signifier (event) and the aporetic dis/order imposed upon it by the necessity of its narration from a particular point of view. [...] [I]n accordance with the structuralist division between parole (individual speech or narration) and langue (the conditions of the narration)[.]
^Felluga, Dino Franco (2015). Critical Theory: Key Concepts. Routledge. p. 16. ISBN978-0-415-69565-7. The social, for Laclau and Mouffe, is nothing but a set of provisional ' nodal points which partially fix meaning ' (113), a process they term articulation [...] 'Antagonisms,' by this thinking, 'are not internal but external to society; or rather, they constitute the limits of society['] [...] In this way, 'antagonism' functions in a way similar to Jacques Lacan's notion of the Real.
^Parker, Ian (2011). Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Revolutions in Subjectivity. Advancing Theory in Therapy. NY: Routledge. p. 145. ISBN978-0-415-45543-5.
^Hurst, Andrea (2008). "12 The 'Talking Cure': Language and Psychoanalysis". Derrida Vis-à-vis Lacan: Interweaving Deconstruction and Psychoanalysis. Fordham University Press. pp. 348–372. ISBN9780823228744. JSTORj.ctt13x0dc2.20. [T]o the extent that one misrecognizes analytical mastery as being a matter of power over others, rather than the self-mastery that is the precondition for ethical action, one retrogresses to the subject position of blindness represented by the King [in The Purloined Letter]. This is the form of Lacan's warning to all analysts (institutional or otherwise). [...] Can one ever be vigilant enough as an analyst to prevent analytical mastery from devolving into ideological mastery? Perhaps one can, in principle, with a ruthless and interminable self-analysis. [...] What psychoanalysis in principle requires of an analyst, or aims at in any psychoanalytically realized subject, is a form of self-mastery, which is defined as the power of inventive self-renewal through the interminable labor of self-analysis.
^ abcTillet, Susana (2001). "Pass (Passe)". In Glowinski, Huguette; Marks, Zita M.; Murphy, Sara (eds.). A Compendium of Lacanian Terms. Free Association Books. p. 132. ISBN1-85343-538-4. In the passage from analysand to psychoanalyst, the analyst consents to become semblant of object a, cause of desire. [...] 'there might have been an analysis but there is no analyst.'
^Dor, Joël (1999). Gurewich, Judith (ed.). The Clinical Lacan. Other Press. p. 17. ISBN978-1-892746-05-4. Editor's Note [...] In Lacanian theory, the phallic function is the organizing principle of the dynamic of the subject's desire. [...] the phallus operates as the signifier of a loss[.]
^Wiley, Norbert (1994). The Semiotic Self. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. p. 117. ISBN0-226-89816-4. Lacan was careless about this word ['father'], as he was about the word 'phallus,' sometimes using them physiologically and sometimes psychologically or functionally (Macey, 1988, pp. 177-209; Sprengnether, 1990, pp. 181-223).
^Casey, Edward S.; Woody, J. Melvin (1983). "Hegel, Heidegger, Lacan: The Dialectic of Desire". In Smith, Joseph H.; Kerrigan, William (eds.). Interpreting Lacan. Psychiatry and the Humanities. Vol. 6. Yale University Press. p. 83. ISBN978-0-300-13581-7. Lacan[... :] 'The phallus is the privileged signifier of that mark in which the role of the logos is joined with the advent of desire (1977, p. 287). The phallus thus stands at that 'intersection of desire and language' which Ricoeur describes as the philosophically critical crossroads of psychoanalytic theory. [...] It also stands for jouissance[...which] cannot be satisfied by any object because 'the being of language is the non-being of objects' (p. 263).
^Fink, Bruce (1997). A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Theory and Technique. Harvard University Press. p. 178. ISBN0-674-13536-9. Something ineffable[...]in Western society is known as the phallus.
^Levy-Stokes, Carmella (2001). "Phallus". In Glowinski, Huguette; Marks, Zita M.; Murphy, Sara (eds.). A Compendium of Lacanian Terms. Free Association Books. pp. 136–143. ISBN1-85343-538-4. [T]he phallus is the signifier of lack [...] [that] constitutes the unconscious as language [...] [and represents] what the mother lacks. [...] the phallus—the signifier of the desire of the Other [...] [mediates] the dialectic of desire.
^Libbrecht, Katrien (2001). "The Real". In Glowinski, Huguette; Marks, Zita M.; Murphy, Sara (eds.). A Compendium of Lacanian Terms. Free Association Books. p. 156. ISBN1-85343-538-4. The real Thing of the drive is jouissance.
^Fink, Bruce (1995). "There's No Such Thing as a Sexual Relationship". The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton University Press. p. 102. ISBN978-0-691-01589-7. Object (a) is thus the real, unspeakable cause of desire, while the phallus is 'the name of desire' and thus pronouncable.
^Barthes, Roland (2010) [1977]. A Lover's Discourse: Fragments. Translated by Howard, Richard. Hill and Wang. pp. 6, 16. ISBN978-0-374-53231-4. Underneath the figure, there is something of the 'verbal hallucination' (Freud, Lacan) [...] Frustration would have Presence as its figure[...]castration has Intermittence as its figure[...]Absence is the figure of privation[...]The discourse of Absence is a text[...][ Ruysbroeck's ] the raised arms of Desire[...]the wide-open arms of Need.
^Levy-Stokes, Carmela (2001). "Castration". In Glowinski, Huguette; Marks, Zita M.; Murphy, Sara (eds.). A Compendium of Lacanian Terms. Free Association Books. p. 46. ISBN1-85343-538-4. In frustration the lack is imaginary[, and ...] [t]he agent of frustration is the mother, at the level of the symbolic. [...] Privation refers to a real lack due to the loss of a symbolic object, the phallus as signifier. [...] The notion of privation implies the symbolization of the object in the Real[.] [...] The agent of privation is the imaginary father. [...] Castration is the symbolic lack of an imaginary object [...] the symbolic debt in the register of the law. [...] castration refers to the loss of the phallus as imaginary object. The agent of castration is the real father.
^Dor, Joël (1999). Gurewich, Judith (ed.). The Clinical Lacan. Other Press. p. 117. ISBN978-1-892746-05-4. The dynamics of desire usually evolve in a threefold rhythm: desire separates out from need and then enters into demand.
^Lewis, Michael (2008). "4 The real writing of Lacan: Another writing". Derrida and Lacan: Another Writing. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 202–269. JSTOR10.3366/j.ctt1r2cj3.10. [T]he 'letter' is the real of the symbolic [...] Lalangue is for Lacan a symptomatic moment in the use of language where its real lettricity or trace-structure comes to the fore. It comes to the fore in repetition or similar phenomena in which language is evacuated of meaning. [...] Lalangue is the moment at which, by failing to make sense, language ceases to communicate. But by failing to communicate, to institute an intersubjective event of meaning, it manages to express the real subject of enunciation in language.
^Guattari, Félix (2006) [1992]. Chaosmosis: an ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Translated by Bains, Paul; Pefanis, Julian. Power Publications. pp. 79–80. ISBN978-0-909952-25-9. As for neurotics, they present all the variants of avoidance evoked above, beginning with the simplest and most reifying, that of phobia, followed by hysteria, which forges from them substitutes in social space and the body, ending with obsessional neurosis which, for its part, secretes a perpetual temporal 'différance' (Derrida), an indefinite procrastination.
^Grigg, Russell (2001). "Discourse". In Glowinski, Huguette; Marks, Zita M.; Murphy, Sara (eds.). A Compendium of Lacanian Terms. Free Association Books. p. 70. ISBN1-85343-538-4. The real driving force behind the hysteric's discourse is the impossible, the Real; the same goes for pure science, for quantified science.
^Fink, Bruce (1995). "The Four Discourses". The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton University Press. p. 134. ISBN978-0-691-01589-7. [I]n the hysteric's discourse, object (a) appears in the position of truth. That means that the truth of the hysteric's discourse, its hidden motor force, is the real.
^Lewis, Michael (2008). "1 Lacan: The name-of-the-father and the phallus". Derrida and Lacan: Another Writing. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 16–79. ISBN9780748636037. JSTOR10.3366/j.ctt1r2cj3.7. [I]n the real, the process of individuation is always incomplete, and it is only language which constructs the illusion that it is complete, that the river has stopped flowing and is now identical with itself.
^Dor, Joël (1999). Gurewich, Judith (ed.). The Clinical Lacan. Other Press. pp. 69–82. ISBN978-1-892746-05-4.
^Hurst, Andrea (2008). "11 The Death Drive and Ethical Action". Derrida Vis-à-vis Lacan: Interweaving Deconstruction and Psychoanalysis. Fordham University Press. pp. 318–347. ISBN9780823228744. JSTORj.ctt13x0dc2.19. Masculine libido believes that jouissance lies in finally realizing the ideal whole, but its death drive toward retrospective illusion of this 'lost' ideal is inherently inhibited because it aims at a delusion, which, therefore, cannot ever be realized. Feminine libido, to the contrary, already knows that the world lacks any legitimate ideal that could ground, unify, and organize all of its parts. Feminine libido, in other words, remains open to Nietzsche's radical nihilism[.] [...] However, to try to force the impossible Real to appear will bring about, on the other side of masculine fanaticism, another kind of terror, namely the will to utter destruction or the will to a chaotic, schizoid state where nothing stable can ever take hold. [...] Those fixated to the feminine death drive compulsively and relentlessly resist any existing order. In other words, to become 'hysterical' is to become fixated to a nonplace in the community and to define oneself, mimicking Hegel, as its 'eternal irony.' [...] jouissance would entail her total exclusion from the world of the living.
^Crockett, Clayton (2007). "2 We Are All Mad: Theology in the Shadow of a Black Sun". Interstices of the Sublime: Theology and Psychoanalytic Theory. Fordham University Press. pp. 37–50. ISBN9780823227211. JSTORj.ctt13x03fr.6. To these alternatives [on madness] Kristeva develops a notion of artistic discourse, which combines elements of neurosis and psychosis into a hallucinatory hysterical discourse, which she claims becomes 'a microscopic expansion of the 'true-real,'[.'] This language 'obliterates [conventional] reality and makes the Real loom forth as a jubilant enigma.'
^Rank, Otto (1932). Art and Artist: Creative Urge and Personality Development. Translated by Atkinson, Charles Francis. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 240. ISBN978-0-393-30574-6. By creating, man makes himself independent of that which exists, or at least he makes a very considerable effort to do so; so far as speech is concerned we can see it in name-magic. [...] lived on in the Pneuma-doctrine[.]
^Guattari, Félix (2006) [1992]. Chaosmosis: an ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Translated by Bains, Paul; Pefanis, Julian. Power Publications. p. 66. ISBN978-0-909952-25-9.
^Hurst, Andrea (2008). "7 The Lacanian Real". Derrida Vis-à-vis Lacan: Interweaving Deconstruction and Psychoanalysis. Fordham University Press. pp. 213–236. ISBN9780823228744. JSTORj.ctt13x0dc2.14. Lacan introduces a term borrowed from Aristotle, 'the tuché,' to name this encounter, which may be described alternatively as the traumatic cause of the repetition compulsion or simply as the Real. The tuché is here contrasted with 'the automaton,' which designates the fabric of phenomenal reality that we humans tend to weave around the Real. [...] Lacan argues, the repetition compulsion is accurately seen to be the 'real cause' of what occurs in the transference[.]
^Bailly, Lionel (2020). "Real, Symbolic, Imaginary". Lacan: A Beginner's Guide. Oneworld Beginner’s Guides. Oneworld. p. 98. ISBN978-1-85168-637-7. The Real is a featureless clay from which reality is fashioned by the Symbolic; it is the chaos from which the world came into being, by means of the Word.
^Long, Jordana Ashman (2018). "The Romance and the Real: A.S. Byatt's Possession: A Romance". Mythlore. 37 (1): 147–164. JSTOR26809329. Retrieved 2022-01-18. Bruce Fink clarifies, 'The real is perhaps best understood as that which has not yet been symbolized, remains to be symbolized, or even resists symbolization'
^Fink, Bruce (1995). "The Creative Function of the Word: The Symbolic and the Real". The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton University Press. p. 25. ISBN978-0-691-01589-7.
^Žižek, Slavoj (1989). "Part III The Subject: Which Subject of the Real?". The Sublime Object of Ideology. Verso. p. 184. ISBN978-1-84467-300-1. [I]t becomes clear that the Real par excellence is jouissance: jouissance does not exist, it is impossible, but it produces a number of traumatic events.
^Parker, Ian (2011). Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Revolutions in Subjectivity. Advancing Theory in Therapy. NY: Routledge. pp. 88, 153. ISBN978-0-415-45543-5. [A]lienation is 'real' as [a] gap in the symbolic, as a necessary contradiction that sustains the way we account for where we are in this political-economic 'reality'. [...] [And] spirituality as a call to the subject that is from way outside taken-for-granted reality, a call that assumes form as something traumatic to the subject that is quite close to what Lacanians might conceptualise as 'real'.
^Carroll, Noël (1990). The Philosophy of Horror or Paradoxes of the Heart. New York, NY: Routledge. p. 165. ISBN0-415-90145-6. The analogy between horror and religious experience is often framed, explicitly or implicitly, in terms of the analysis of religious or numinous experience developed by Rudolf Otto in his[...]proto-phenomenological classic The Idea of the Holy.
^Bloom, Harold (1980). "Freud's Concepts of Defense and the Poetic Will". In Smith, Joseph H. (ed.). The Literary Freud: Mechanisms of Defense and the Poetic Will. Psychiatry and the Humanities. Vol. 4. Yale University Press. pp. 7–8. ISBN0-300-02405-3. '[T]hose very objects so terrible to the will[...]he is then filled with the feeling of the sublime...' [...] Repression, like the movement to the Sublime, is a turning operation, away from the drive and toward the heaping up of the unconscious. Pragmatically, repression, like Schopenhauer's Sublime, exalts mind over reality, over the hostile object-world[.]
^MacCannell, Juliet Flower (1983). "Oedipus Wrecks: Lacan, Stendhal and the Narrative Form of the Real". MLN. 98 (5): 910–940. doi:10.2307/2906054. JSTOR2906054. Retrieved 2022-01-17. [F]or Lacan[...]The Real lurks in [...] the very signifiers out of which the Symbolic is constructed [...] whose method consists in separating signifiers not from their referent (their referents are already symbols) but from the aim of satisfaction, from conscious desire [...] The story that narrates the act both of stopping the fiction-making machine [...] by examining both the impossibility of satisfaction, and ironically, simultaneously, its reality, makes a good narrative against narratives.
^Lacan, Jacques (2006) [1966]. "Seminar on 'The Purloined Letter'". Écrits. Translated by Fink, Bruce. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 17. ISBN978-0-393-32925-4. For it can literally be said that something is missing from its place only of what can change it: the symbolic. For the real, whatever upheaval we subject it to, is always in its place; it carries it glued to its heel, ignorant of what might exile it from it.
^ abKristeva, Julia (2002) [1989]. "Powers of Horror". In Oliver, Kelly (ed.). The Portable Kristeva. European Perspectives (updated ed.). Columbia University Press. pp. 230, 238, 241. ISBN0-231-12629-8. To each ego its object, to each superego its abject. [...] There is an effervescence of object and sign—not of desire but of intolerable significance; they tumble over into non-sense or the impossible real, but they appear even so in spite of 'myself' (which is not) as abjection. [...] [Abjection] takes the ego back to its source on the abominable limits[...]the ego has broken away[...]non-ego, drive, and death. Abjection is a resurrection that has gone through death (of the ego).
^Foster, Hal (1996). "Obscene, Abject, Traumatic". October. 78: 106–124. doi:10.2307/778908. JSTOR778908. Retrieved 2022-03-23. The breaching of the body, the gaze devouring the subject, the subject becoming the space, the state of mere similarity [or, the uncanny.] [...] If there is a subject of history for the culture of abjection at all, it is[...]the Corpse.
^Still, Judith (1997). "Horror in Kristeva and Bataille: Sex and Violence". Paragraph. 20 (3): 221–239. doi:10.3366/para.1997.20.3.221. JSTOR43263665. Retrieved 2022-03-23. Naomi Schor writes: 'Otherness in Beauvoir's scheme of things is utter negativity; it is the realm of what Kristeva has called the abject.' [...] the abject must exist on the border between inside and outside – you generate fresh neither/nors: neither accepting a frontier nor breaching it. [...] [an] impossible, non-space. [...] neither subject nor object[.] [...] The abject is not the objet a
^Smith, Joseph H. (1992). "Mourning, Art, and Human Historicity". In Smith, Joseph H.; Morris, Humphrey (eds.). Telling Facts: History and Narration in Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry and the Humanities. Vol. 13. The Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 131. ISBN0-8018-4305-7. By extension of each person's fear of literally dying, with its unknown time and mode, would be conditioned by various modes of dying throughout life. Death and threatening death as absence, lack, alienation, separation, and loss enter in with the first imaging. Death symbolizes all of these, and all of these symbolize death. This is the meaning of castration.
^Fink, Bruce (1995). "There's No Such Thing as a Sexual Relationship". The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton University Press. pp. 99, 101. ISBN978-0-691-01589-7. Lacan's notion of castration focuses essentially on the renunciation of jouissance and not on the penis, and therefore that it applies to both men and women insofar as they 'alienate' (in the Marxist sense of the term) a part of their jouissance. [...] Limit, lack, loss: these [...] constitute what Lacan refers to as castration.
^Lewis, Michael (2008). "1 Lacan: The name-of-the-father and the phallus". Derrida and Lacan: Another Writing. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 16–79. doi:10.3366/j.ctt1r2cj3.7 (inactive 1 November 2024). JSTOR10.3366/j.ctt1r2cj3.10. The ego is 'a particular object within the experience of the subject. Literally, the ego is an object' (SII: 44; cf. SI: 193).{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
^Hurst, Andrea (2008). "3 Derrida: Différance and the 'Plural Logic of the Aporia'". Derrida Vis-à-vis Lacan: Interweaving Deconstruction and Psychoanalysis. Fordham University Press. pp. 72–112. ISBN9780823228744. JSTORj.ctt13x0dc2.8. [W]hen the Symbolic Order is suspended and the actual Antigone becomes the Thing. In this moment of collapse, she herself becomes singular, unfathomable, inimitable. To repeat Žižek's words: 'for a brief, passing moment of decision, she is the Thing directly.' Thus she is the one for whom there is no mirroring neighbor, and she excludes herself from the network of rules that constitutes communal life, becoming the traumatic cause of her own framework of value.
^Crockett, Clayton (2007). "3 Desiring the Thing: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis". Interstices of the Sublime: Theology and Psychoanalytic Theory. Fordham University Press. pp. 51–67. ISBN9780823227211. JSTORj.ctt13x03fr.7. [I]deal desire, which is, strictly speaking, impossible. Here the arc of desire is asymptotic in its approximation of the limit, God or death. This is the ideal form of desire, which sustains an unbelievable and impossible tension in its approach of its goal or telos.
^Kawai, Hayao (1996). Buddhism and the Art of Psychotherapy. Texas A&M University Press. p. 111. ISBN978-1-60344-053-0. David Rosen's Transforming Depression [...] introducing the key concept of 'egocide.'
^Brown, Rebecca; Stobart, Karen (2018) [2008]. Understanding Boundaries and Containment in Clinical Practice. The Society of Analytical Psychology Monograph Series. Routledge. p. 18. ISBN978-1-85575-393-8. We use the term pre-oedipal to define the baby's earliest awareness of [dyadic] 'otherness'[.]
^Wiley, Norbert (1994). The Semiotic Self. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. p. 118. ISBN0-226-89816-4. [I]n the oedipal period, the father-function is added to the mother-child dyad of the pre-oedipal, [and] the semiotic triad is [then] completed[.]
^Fink, Bruce (1995). "The Creative Function of the Word: The Symbolic and the Real". The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton University Press. p. 27. ISBN978-0-691-01589-7. [A] real before the letter, that is, a presymbolic real, which, in the final analysis, is but our own hypothesis (R1)[.] [A] real after the letter [...] (R2) [...] is generated by the symbolic.
^Lewis, Michael (2008). "1 Lacan: The name-of-the-father and the phallus". Derrida and Lacan: Another Writing. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 16–79. ISBN9780748636037. JSTOR10.3366/j.ctt1r2cj3.7. Thus our self-relation, our understanding of who and what we are, is fully determined, at the level of both the imaginary ['who'] (which is to say the signified) and the symbolic ['what'] (which is to say the signifier). These are both alienations because our real singularity is neither a 'who' nor a 'what'. It precedes the determination of the individual subject (ipseity, whoness) and the determination of an essence (quiddity, whatness).
^ abLloyd, Moya (2006). "Julia Kristeva (1941–)". In Simons, Jon (ed.). Contemporary Critical Theorists: From Lacan to Said. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 135–151. ISBN9780748617197. JSTOR10.3366/j.ctvxcrrt8.13. The semiotic, for Kristeva, is a pre-linguistic or pre-symbolic space, the realm of the 'unspeakable' or the 'unnameable', or what Kristeva following Plato calls the 'chora'. It is the site of energies and bodily drives [...] It is related to what psychoanalysts call the pre-oedipal, that is, [...] a symbiotic state with the mother in which it cannot distinguish between its own body and hers.
^ abLacan, Jacques (2006) [1966]. "On a Question Prior to Any Possible Treatment of Psychosis". Écrits. Translated by Fink, Bruce. W. W. Norton & Company. pp. 718–719. ISBN978-0-393-32925-4. 'lamella' [...] this image and this myth seem to me apt for both illustrating and situating what I call 'libido.' This image shows 'libido' to be what it is—namely, an organ, to which its habit make it far more akin than to a force field. [...] This organ must be called 'unreal,' in the sense in which the unreal is not the [post mirror stage] imaginary and precedes the subjective realm it conditions, being in direct contact with the real. That is what my myth, like any other myth, strives to provide a symbolic articulation for, rather than an image. [...] Libido is this lamella that the organism's being takes to its true limit, which goes further than the body's limit. [...] This lamella is an organ, since it is an instrument of an organism.
^Guattari, Félix (2006) [1992]. Chaosmosis: an ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Translated by Bains, Paul; Pefanis, Julian. Power Publications. p. 96. ISBN978-0-909952-25-9. The most elaborate narratives, myths and icons always return to this point of chaosmic see-sawing, to this singular ontological orality. [...] When I "consume" a work — a term which ought to be changed, because it can just as easily be absence of work — I carry out a complex ontological crystallisation, an alterification of beings-there. [...] Not only is I an other, but it is a multitude of modalities of alterity.
^Sloterdijk, Peter (2011). "Nobjects and Un-Relationships". Spheres. Foreign Agents Series. Vol. I: Bubbles: Microspherology. Translated by Wieland, Hoban. Semiotext(e). p. 294. ISBN978-1-58435-104-7.
^Kernberg, Otto (1995) [1976]. Object-Relations Theory and Clinical Psychoanalysis. Jason Aronson, Inc. p. 64. ISBN1-56821-612-2. [T]he 'bad' nucleus of self-experience is ascribed to 'uncanny,' disturbing, or frightening experiences and is subject to later projective mechanisms.
^McWilliams, Nancy (2020) [2011]. "Primary Defensive Processes". Psychoanalytic Diagnosis: Understanding Personality Structure in the Clinical Diagnosis (second ed.). The Guilford Press. p. 118. ISBN978-1-4625-4369-4. Analysts have long described somatizing patients as characterized by alexithymia, or lack of words for affect (Krystal, 1988, 1997; McDougall, 1989; Sifneos, 1973), an observation supported by a recent, comprehensive study by Mattila and colleagues (2008). [...] Waldinger, Shulz, Barsky, and Ahern (2006) found that both insecure attachment and a childhood history of trauma are associated with somatization.
^Buchanan, Ian (2021). The Incomplete Project of Schizoanalysis. Edinburgh University Press. p. 92. ISBN978-1-4744-8789-4. History, as [Frederic] Jameson sees it, is an active force that every writer has to confront [...] choices to do with how they construct their characters, the shape of the narratives, down to the style of their sentences — are symptomatic of the times.
^ abHurst, Andrea (2008). "7 The Lacanian Real". Derrida Vis-à-vis Lacan: Interweaving Deconstruction and Psychoanalysis. Fordham University Press. pp. 213–236. ISBN9780823228744. JSTORj.ctt13x0dc2.14. [T]he relation to the Real in the transference is expressed in terms of the automaton: such analysts [...] apprehend, an original event, a first encounter, the positively present 'real thing' that lies behind the fantasy. It is, supposedly, this determinable event in narrative history that the analysand repeats or acts out (in disguise) in the transference.
^Marriott, David S. (2021). Lacan Noir: Lacan and Afro-pessimism. The Palgrave Lacan Series. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 18, 47, 71. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74978-1. ISBN978-3-030-74977-4. S2CID242148951. [I]t would be[...]absurd to think about the signifier without desire. [...] The object has to be symbolized as an absence[.] [...] The object leaves behind the trace in its passage to the signifier, and from those who mistake the sign for the object (the white philosopher who colonizes nature as absence?)[.] [...] In Black Skin, White Masks the imaginary forms of the ego and object loss are the same, the desire to see oneself as other than one is and the self-mutilating mimicry of object loss is the same.
^George, Sheldon (2012). "Approaching the 'Thing' of Slavery: A Lacanian Analysis of Toni Morrison's 'Beloved'". African American Review. 45 (1/2): 115–130. doi:10.1353/afa.2012.0008. JSTOR23783440. S2CID161543695. Retrieved 2022-12-09. [T]he racist Symbolic, emerging for many African Americans as the Real void into which all losses fall and the 'excluded' center around which all subjective meaning gather (Ethics 71). Race has concomitantly emerged for many African Americans as what Lacan calls the objet a, the fantasy object that promises to guarantee the fullness of an identity that is both individual and communal, a group identity that can return African Americans to the jouissance of that illusory wholeness which is figured as having been shattered by slavery in a primal, historical confrontation with lack.
^Crockett, Clayton (2007). "9 Expressing the Real: Lacan and the Limits of Language". Interstices of the Sublime: Theology and Psychoanalytic Theory. Fordham University Press. pp. 148–164. ISBN9780823227211. JSTORj.ctt13x03fr.13. In Lacanian terms, the Real would constitute the critique of symbolic, signifying categories and the shift toward an opacity of vision [...] one that would acknowledge the necessity of W. E. B. Dubois's double-consciousness.
^Scott, Maria (2008). "Lacan's 'Of the Gaze as Objet Petit a' as Anamorphic Discourse". Paragraph. 31 (3): 327–343. doi:10.3366/E0264833408000308. JSTOR43151894. S2CID146191352. Retrieved 2022-01-17. Lacan's running metaphor of the text as labyrinth[...]Anamorphosis can therefore be produced by the traversal of a grid[...]the text-tapestry is traversed [...] The object a represented by the gaze is, like desire itself for Lacan, metonymic in structure, always slipping away from understanding.
^Laing, R. D. (1969) [1959]. "The embodied and unembodied self". The Divided Self: An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness. Penguin Books. p. 69. ISBN978-0-14-013537-4. The unembodied self becomes hyper-conscious. It attempts to posit its own imagos.
^Fink, Bruce (1997). A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Theory and Technique. Harvard University Press. ISBN0-674-13536-9.
^ abMarriott, David S. (2021). Lacan Noir: Lacan and Afro-pessimism. The Palgrave Lacan Series. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 54. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74978-1. ISBN978-3-030-74977-4. S2CID242148951. The imago is a primordial structure which makes us say yes, that is me, and no, that is not me. [...] In the imago meanings coalesce into incontrovertible representations (vorstellungen, or word and thing representations).
^Lewis, Michael (2008). "1 Lacan: The name-of-the-father and the phallus". Derrida and Lacan: Another Writing. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 16–79. ISBN9780748636037. JSTOR10.3366/j.ctt1r2cj3.7. A symptom is a failed attempt on the part of the speaking subject to express itself in language. Thus the symptom is a symptom of our desire.
^Lefebvre, Henri (2002) [1974]. The Production of Space. Translated by Nicholson-Smith, Donald. Blackwell Publishing. pp. 94–95. ISBN0-631-18177-6.
^Sartre, Jean-Paul (1992) [1983]. Notebooks For an Ethics. Translated by Pellauer, David. University of Chicago Press. p. 494. ISBN0-226-73511-7.
^Brisman, Susan Hawk; Brisman, Leslie (1980). "Lies against Solitude: Symbolic, Imaginary, and Real". In Smith, Joseph H. (ed.). The Literary Freud: Mechanisms of Defense and the Poetic Will. Psychiatry and the Humanities. Vol. 4. Yale University Press. p. 40. ISBN0-300-02405-3. Like an analysand, a poetic speaker may belie the reality of his solitude by invoking an Original Presence (God or idealized parent) or some person or image, like the sea, that represents a fully idealized Presence.
^Jung, Carl (1971). "Individual Dream Symbolism in Relation to Alchemy". In Campbell, Joseph (ed.). The Portable Jung. Penguin Books. p. 330. ISBN978-0-14-015070-4. The sea is the symbol of the collective unconscious, because unfathomed depths lie concealed beneath its reflecting surface.
^Thacker, Eugene (2010). In the Dust of this Planet. Vol. [Horror of Philosophy Vol. 1]. Zero Books. p. 31. ISBN978-1-84694-676-9. If the anthropological demon (the human relating to itself) functioned via metaphor, and if the mythological demon (the human relating to the non-human) functioned via allegory, then perhaps there is a third demon[...]'meontological' (having to do with non-being rather than being).
^Tynan, Aidan (2016). "Desert Earth: Geophilosophy and the Anthropocene". Deleuze Studies. 10 (4): 479–495. doi:10.3366/dls.2016.0240. JSTOR45331751. Retrieved 2022-02-10. [T]he desert is used to evoke the sense of a 'world without others'. [...] but in its [the desert's] hostility to organic life it also suggests the radical discontinuity of a world left bereft by a presence that has withdrawn to the heavens [...] For Nietzsche, a 'basic fact of the human will' is its ' horror vacui ', its fear of nothingness or emptiness (Nietzsche 1997: 8). [...] The ascetic ideal—the attachment to a 'spiritual' domain of values rather than to the physical here and now—emerges as a solution to this horror.
^Peak, David (2014). The Spectacle of the Void. U.S.A.: Schism Press. p. 43. ISBN978-1503007161. As Nietzsche so famously wrote in Beyond Good and Evil, 'When you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you.' This is the horror within, the finding of oneself, the eternal return of the self and the inescapable prison of consciousness, in the searching of what lies beyond the veil.
^Lacan, Jacques (2006). "The Instance of the Letter in the Unconscious". Écrits. Translated by Fink, Bruce. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 434. ISBN978-0-393-32925-4. It was the abyss, open to the thought that a thought might make itself heard in the abyss, that gave rise to resistance to psychoanalysis from the outset—not the emphasis on man's sexuality, as is commonly said.
^Ricoeur, Paul (1970). "Book III: Dialectic: A Philosophical Interpretation of Freud: 1. Epistemology: Between Psychology and Phenomenology: Psychoanalysis is not Phenomenology". Terry Lectures: Freud & Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. Translated by Savage, Denis. Yale University Press. p. 402. ISBN978-0-300-02189-9. [Leplanche and Leclaire] use the bar to express the double nature of repression: it is a barrier that separates the systems, and a relating that ties together the relations of signifier to signified[...]Metaphor is nothing other than repression, and vice versa[.]
^Morris, Humphrey (1980). "The Need to Connect: Representations of Freud's Psychical Apparatus". In Smith, Joseph H. (ed.). The Literary Freud: Mechanisms of Defense and the Poetic Will. Psychiatry and the Humanities. Vol. 4. Yale University Press. p. 312. ISBN0-300-02405-3. Übertragen and metapherein are synonyms, both meaning to transfer, to carry over or beyond, and I. A. Richards pointed out a long time ago in The Philosophy of Rhetoric that what psychoanalysts call transference is another name for metaphor.
^Fouad, Jehan Farouk; Alwakeel, Saeed (2013). "Representations of the Desert in Silko's 'Ceremony' and Al-Koni's 'The Bleeding of the Stone'". Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics. 33 (The Desert: Human Geography and Symbolic Economy): 36–62. JSTOR24487181. Retrieved 2022-02-09. The connection between 'place' and 'metaphor' is evident. Paul Ricœur remarks that 'as figure, metaphor constitutes a displacement and an extension of the meaning of words; its explanation is grounded in the theory of substitution ' (The Rule of Metaphor 3; italics added).
^Frye, Northrop (1973) [1957]. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton University Press. pp. 123, 124, 125, 142, 143. ISBN0-691-01298-9. [M]etaphor turns its back on ordinary descriptive meaning, and presents a structure which literally is ironic and paradoxical. [...] In the anagogic aspect of meaning, the radical form of metaphor, 'A is B[.]' [...] Interpretation proceeds by metaphor as well as creation[.] ... As for human society, the metaphor that we are all members of one body has organized most political theory from Plato to our own day. [...] Plato's Republic[...][wherein] reason, will, and desire of the individual appear as the philosopher-king, guards, and artisans of the state, is also founded on this metaphor, which in fact we still use whenever we speak of a group or aggregate of human beings as a 'body.'
^Hillman, James (1977). Re-Visioning Psychology. Harper. pp. 169–170. ISBN978-0-06-090563-7. In archetypal psychology Gods are imagined. They are approached through psychological methods of personifying, pathologizing, and psychologizing. They are formulated ambiguously, as metaphors for modes of experience and as numinous borderline persons. They are cosmic perspectives in which the soul participates. They are lords of its realms of being, the patterns for its mimesis.
^Deleuze, Gilles; Guattari, Félix (2009) [1965]. "The Urstaat". Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Hurley, Robert; Seem, Mark; Lane R., Helen. Penguin Books. p. 222. ISBN978-0-14-310582-4. [A] becoming of the State: its internalization in a field of increasingly decoded social forces forming a physical system; its spiritualization in a superterrestrial field that increasingly overcodes, forming a metaphysical system.
^Smith, Joseph H. (1992). "Mourning, Art, and Human Historicity". In Smith, Joseph H.; Morris, Humphrey (eds.). Telling Facts: History and Narration in Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry and the Humanities. Vol. 13. The Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 137. ISBN0-8018-4305-7. Metaphor, in which one thing can substitute for another, is usually thought to occur only after the differentiation of image and object; of memory, percept, and anticipation; of the 'I' and the other.
^Hooper, Barbara (2001). "Desiring Presence, Romancing the Real". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 91 (4): 703–715. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00269. JSTOR3651232. S2CID140190665. Retrieved 2022-02-09. Cartesian and cartographic anxiety would be, in [Edward] Casey's terms, the place-panic[.] [...] Chaos, with its material confusion and gaping character, also gives rise to 'place-panic' [the 'depression or terror...of an empty space'] ([Edward] Casey 1997 [6,] 10). Place is a presence that prevents the anxiety produced by absence, or horror vacui. [...] When the Demiurge confronts chora in this formless state, he 'is threatened' (Casey 1997, 37) [...] Chora is the thing on which things come to appearance.
^Dreyfus, Hubert L. (1991). Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time, Division I. The MIT Press. p. 179. ISBN978-0-262-54056-8. But unlike ordinary equipmental breakdown, anxiety is a total disturbance. [...] it reveals the whole world as if from outside. It reveals the groundlessness of the world and of Dasein's being-in-the-world. 'That in the face of which one has anxiety is being-in-the-world as such' (230) [186].
^Rank, Otto (1932). Art and Artist: Creative Urge and Personality Development. Translated by Atkinson, Charles Francis. W. W. Norton & Company. pp. 208, 209. ISBN978-0-393-30574-6. Another Vedic tradition, preserved in the late hymn of the Rigveda, tells how the gods made the world from the dismembered body of the primitive giant Purushu [...] represents a cosmic extension of man into the universe: the foot which touches the earth is extended to be the earth itself, the head which stretches heavenward is raised and magnified to be the heaven itself—in a term of Schopenhauer's (which incidentally contains his whole teaching), we are dealing with a 'makanthropos.'
^Stolorow, Robert D. (2011). World, Affectivity, Trauma: Heidegger and post-Cartesian Psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Inquiry Book Series. Vol. 35. Routledge. p. 17. ISBN978-0-203-81581-6.
^Guattari, Félix (2006) [1992]. Chaosmosis: an ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Translated by Bains, Paul; Pefanis, Julian. Power Publications. p. 103. ISBN978-0-909952-25-9. Dualisms in an impasse, like the oppositions between[...]the real and the imaginary, involve a recourse to transcendent, omnipotent and homogenetic instances: God, Being, Absolute Spirit, Energy, The Signifier[.]
^Brown, Rebecca; Stobart, Karen (2018) [2008]. Understanding Boundaries and Containment in Clinical Practice. The Society of Analytical Psychology Monograph Series. Routledge. p. 52. ISBN978-1-85575-393-8. The Transcendent Function is a rather complex Jungian concept that describes the capacity of the mind to bridge conscious and unconscious thought. [...] Describing the Transcendent Function as a 'third hand' applies to the Oedipal concept of the 'threeness'[.]
^Horney, Karen (1994) [1968]. Self-Analysis. W. W. Norton. p. 127. ISBN0-393-31165-1. '[R]esistance.' [...] His associations become shallow, unproductive, and evasive [...] He may reject every attempt to help with a rigid feeling of hopelessness and futility. Fundamentally, the reason for this impasse is that certain insights are not acceptable to the patient; they are too painful, too frightening, and they undermine illusions that he cherishes and is incapable of relinquishing. [...] all he knows, or thinks he knows, is that he is misunderstood or humiliated or that the work is futile.
^Young, Mark (2020). "Confrontation". Learning the Art of Helping: Building Blocks and Techniques. Pearson. p. 168. A discrepancy is an inconsistency, mixed message, or conflict among a client's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors.
^Lewis, Michael (2008). "1 Lacan: The name-of-the-father and the phallus". Derrida and Lacan: Another Writing. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 16–79. ISBN9780748636037. JSTOR10.3366/j.ctt1r2cj3.7. The ego is that which resists the unconscious's acceding to consciousness. [...] The (unconscious) subject is pure speech, outside of all language.
^Schwall, Hedwig (1997). "Lacan or an Introduction to the Realms of Unknowing". Literature and Theology. 11 (2): 125–144. doi:10.1093/litthe/11.2.125. JSTOR23926831. Retrieved 2022-05-15. Especially in this lonely prayer, Jesus prefigures the situation of the mystic who must go through the night of the senses, through a period in which God [Yahweh] seems to avert his face. Lacan sees something similar in the moment of the ' passe ', the moment of crisis in a speaking cure in which all subjectivity, the last imaginary residue, all self-love falls away. There, the defences of the 'I' (both in its [barred subject symbol]- and [petit objet] a-aspect, i.e. as a speaking subject and one who seeks the image of his self at a moment of crisis) are overruled and the [Big Other] A takes over; this is an experience which approximates the 'real I', the hallucinatory[.]
^Horney, Karen (1994) [1968]. Self-Analysis. W. W. Norton. p. 133. ISBN0-393-31165-1. To him [patient] an undermining of his inflated notions means a destruction of his faith in himself. He realizes that he is not as saintly, as loving, as powerful, as independent as he had believed, and he cannot accept himself bereft of glory. At that point he needs someone who does not lose faith in him, even though his own faith is gone.
^Lewis, Michael (2008). "1 Lacan: The name-of-the-father and the phallus". Derrida and Lacan: Another Writing. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 16–79. ISBN9780748636037. JSTOR10.3366/j.ctt1r2cj3.7. 'One trains analysts so that there are subjects in whom the ego is absent. That is the ideal of analysis, which, of course, remains virtual. There is never a subject without an ego, a fully realised subject, but that in fact is what one must aim to obtain from the subject in analysis' (SII: 246, my italics).
^Smith, Joseph H.; Kerrigan, William, eds. (1983). Interpreting Lacan. Psychiatry and the Humanities. Vol. 6. Yale University Press. pp. 54, 168, 173, 199, 202, 219. ISBN978-0-300-13581-7.
^Bailly, Lionel (2020). "Real, Symbolic, Imaginary". Lacan: A Beginner's Guide. Oneworld Beginner’s Guides. Oneworld. p. 48. ISBN978-1-85168-637-7. For Lacan, there are no signifieds in the unconscious, only signifiers.
^Boothby, Richard (2001). Freud as Philosopher: metapsychology after Lacan. Routledge. pp. 13, 14. ISBN0-415-92590-8. The Lacanian subject is 'strung along' by the unfolding of the chain of signifiers; its very being is conditioned by the organization of a linguistic code. ... For Lacan, the unconscious is 'the discourse of the Other.' Human desire is 'the desire of the Other.'
^Dor, Joël (1999). Gurewich, Judith (ed.). The Clinical Lacan. Other Press. p. 19. ISBN978-1-892746-05-4. Editor's Note
^Schwartz-Salant, Nathan (2018) [1989]. The Borderline Personality: Vision and Healing. Chiron Publications. p. 26. ISBN978-1-63051-515-7. In his study of faith in the works of Winnicott, Bion, and Lacan, Michael Eigen writes that 'It is [the] intersection of profound vulnerability and saving indestructability that brings the paradox of faith to a new level' (1981, p. 416) [...] The 'object' survives the attacks of the 'subject' just as Job survives Yahweh's attacks.
^ abKacirek, Susanne (1988). "Subject-Object Differentiation in the Analysis of Borderline Cases: The Great Mother, the Self, and Others". In Swartz-Salant, Nathan; Stein, Murray (eds.). The Borderline Personality in Analysis. The Chiron Clinical Series. Chiron Publications. pp. 87, 88. ISBN0-933029-13-6. This grandiose Self-Great Mother construction has nothing spontaneous about it, and the only alternative to its stony embrace is the black hole: Nothingness. The Self is indeed the prisoner of the Death Mother. [...] That emptiness was filled by the negative pole of the combined Self-Great Mother archetype, i.e., the black unconsciousness of a Death Mother.
^Campbell, Joseph (2008) [1949]. "Initiation: The Ultimate Boon". The Hero with a Thousand Faces. New World Library. p. 163. ISBN978-1-57731-593-3.
^WHITE, ROBERT S. (2011). "Bion and Mysticism: The Western Tradition". American Imago. 68 (2): 213–240. doi:10.1353/aim.2011.0027. JSTOR26305190. S2CID170557065. Retrieved 2022-08-23. 'I [Bion] shall use the sign O to denote that which is the ultimate reality represented by terms such as absolute truth, the godhead, the infinite, the thing-in-itself. [...] it can 'become,'[.' ...] For Bion, there is an original oneness that is split by the catastrophic divisions of birth and subsequent traumas[. ...] Fantasies of oneness can be found in the need for fusion or what Freud (1930) termed the 'oceanic feeling.' [...] Michael Eigen (1981) sees O as the emotional truth of a session. O, for both commentators [Ogden and Eigen], has luminosity; it expresses wonder and ineffability, a truth that cannot be reduced to facts.
^WHITE, ROBERT S. (2011). "Bion and Mysticism: The Western Tradition". American Imago. 68 (2): 213–240. doi:10.1353/aim.2011.0027. JSTOR26305190. S2CID170557065. Retrieved 2022-08-23. The [Bionian] analyst ['refraining' from reactionary memory or desire] allows himself to become a pure container, into which flow the patient's projections and [Beta]-elements [or inner-object projections]. [... allowing for] the emergence of the unknown and formless void[.]
^Lerner, Pablo (2024) [2023]. Speculating on the Edge of Psychoanalysis: Rings and Voids. The Lines of the Symbolic in Psychoanalysis Series. doi:10.4324/9781003278740. ISBN978-1-03-224477-8. We may interpret Spinoza's God as the real, and the finite sum of the causally interconnected finite modes conceived under the attribute of thought as the symbolic.
^Shaviro, Steven (2014). "Noncorrelational Thought". The Universe of Things: on Speculative Realism. University of Minnesota Press. p. 130. ISBN978-0-8166-8926-2. [Laruelle] insists on a ' non-intuitive phenomenality,' which manifests the ' radical immanence or immanence (to) itself ' of the Real, or of what he calls 'the One' (Laruelle 1999, 141).
^Cioran, E. M. (1956). "Some Blind Alleys: A Letter". The Temptation To Exist. Translated by Howard, Richard. Arcade Publishing. p. 121. ISBN978-1-61145-738-4.
^Chase, Cynthia (1992). "Translating the Transference: Psychoanalysis and the Construction of History". In Smith, Joseph H.; Morris, Humphrey (eds.). Telling Facts: History and Narration in Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry and the Humanities. Vol. 13. The Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 107. ISBN0-8018-4305-7. The category of the Real radically reorients the notion of 'reality' in Freud's text. Whereas Freudian 'reality' is constituted by 'symbolizing what ought to be symbolized (castration),' in Laplanche and Pontalis's revealing paraphrase (1973, 168), the Real is what can enter psychical experience only through hallucination. 'What has been foreclosed from the Symbolic reappears in the Real' (Lacan 1966, 388). Disavowal would then be a mode of access to as well as a mode of defense against 'history,' now construed as that which eludes symbolization.
^Hecq, Dominique (2001). "Foreclosure". In Glowinski, Huguette; Marks, Zita M.; Murphy, Sara (eds.). A Compendium of Lacanian Terms. Free Association Books. pp. 72, 74. ISBN1-85343-538-4. [P]sychosis produces two holes where in the Other in the place places where the Name-of-the-Father and the phallus should be[.] [...] Lacan borrowed the term 'foreclosure' [...] to convey the exclusion of a signifier in psychosis [...and the term] roughly corresponds to the German Verwefung (repudiation) used by Freud [...and can be] defined as a process of exclusion of the primary signifier, marked by the foreclosure of the Name-of-the-Father. Here is the origin of the Lacanian formula for psychosis as a hole, a lack at the level of the signifier.
^Fink, Bruce (1995). The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton University Press. p. 45. ISBN978-0-691-01589-7. Lacan states that in psychosis this split [barring/dividing] cannot be assumed to have occurred at all[.]
^Grigg, Russell (2008). Lacan, Language, and Philosophy. State University of New York Press. p. 10. ISBN978-0-7914-7345-0.
^Lewis, Michael (2008). "1 Lacan: The name-of-the-father and the phallus". Derrida and Lacan: Another Writing. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 16–79. ISBN9780748636037. JSTOR10.3366/j.ctt1r2cj3.7. [I]t is primal repression. Lacan names this repression with the Freudian word, Verwerfung, which he translates as ' forclusion ', foreclosure.
^Muller, John P. (1983). "Language, Psychosis, and the Subject in Lacan". In Smith, Joseph H.; Kerrigan, William (eds.). Interpreting Lacan. Psychiatry and the Humanities. Vol. 6. Yale University Press. p. 29. ISBN978-0-300-13581-7. In the psychotic state, there is no distance or perspective on experience, there is [...] no true signifier-signified relationship. The symptom no longer signifies but is lived, a metaphor lived as real. Words do not mediate, do not refer to what is absent, but function in the real as objects (akin to Freud's analysis of schizophrenia as cathexis of the Wortvorstellung in place of the Sachvorstellung [1915, pp. 197-204]).
^Phillips, James (2000). "Peircean Reflections on Psychotic Discourse". In Muller, John; Brent, Joseph (eds.). Peirce, Semiotics, and Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry and the Humanities. Vol. 15. The Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 20, 21. ISBN0-8018-6288-4. Muller has explained the breakdown of normal language use in schizophrenia as a failure to use language in its mediating role between the subject and the unarticulated, unsymbolized world—what Lacan terms the Real. [...] indifferent things becomes an inexhaustible reservoir of gesture and meaning.
^Schwartz-Salant, Nathan (2018) [1989]. The Borderline Personality: Vision and Healing. Chiron Publications. p. 99. ISBN978-1-63051-515-7. In extreme instances, a relationship [to the Kleinian object can be] dominated by projective identification [and] can trigger psychotic episodes.
^Marriott, David S. (2021). Lacan Noir: Lacan and Afro-pessimism. The Palgrave Lacan Series. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 98. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74978-1. ISBN978-3-030-74977-4. S2CID242148951. Lacan knew, with genius, how psychosis reversed meaning, was ensnared in ressentiment, and in ways opposed to morality, to reason. Here the signifier is immersed in a mystical body in which it takes its root, an interiority that is foreclosed.
^Brenner, Leon S. (2020). Neill, Calum; Hook, Derek (eds.). The Autistic Subject: On the Threshold of Language. The Palgrave Lacan Series. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 175, 251, 252. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50715-2. ISBN978-3-030-50714-5. S2CID226498174. In the case of the foreclosure of the rim, this negativity would entail the presence of the void in the real. Facing this dimension of lack brings autistic subjects to experience unbearable anxiety that they associate with a 'pure presence of death' (Laurent, 2012a, pp. 67-69, 84). [...] In order to surmount this terrible anxiety or troumatisme, while having no access to symbolic castration, the autistic subject is disposed to achieve a 'castration in the real' (Laurent, 2012a, p. 67). [...] [T]he open synthetic Other [...] Some autistic individuals use these [synthetic, as opposed to 'organic'] intellectual models[...]to understand human behavior; others go as far as making their expertise into a profession[.]
^Rodriguez, Leonardo (2001). "Autism and Childhood Psychosis". In Glowinski, Huguette; Marks, Zita M.; Murphy, Sara (eds.). A Compendium of Lacanian Terms. Free Association Books. p. 27. ISBN1-85343-538-4. By attempting to create a lack, the autistic subject attempts to create desire in the Other [...] the Leforts argue, the Other is reduced to an absence [...] (Lefort and Lefort, 1992, 1994).
^Fink, Bruce (1997). A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Theory and Technique. Harvard University Press. pp. 33, 165. ISBN0-674-13536-9. What are symbolic relations? [...] [T]he Law [...or social] ideals [...] Symbolic relations include all the conflicts associated with what is commonly referred to in psychoanalysis as 'castration anxiety.' [...] [W]e see an[...]absence of the law in psychosis, and a definitive instatement of the law in neurosis (overcome only in fantasy), [and] in perversion the subject struggles to bring the law into being—in a word, to make the Other exist.
^McWilliams, Nancy (2020) [2011]. "Schizoid Personalities". Psychoanalytic Diagnosis: Understanding Personality Structure in the Clinical Diagnosis (second ed.). The Guilford Press. p. 197. ISBN978-1-4625-4369-4. I am often asked whether I see schizoid people as on the autistic spectrum, and I am not sure how to answer. [...] Perhaps schizoid psychology, especially in its high-functioning versions, can be reasonably viewed as at the healthy end of the autism spectrum.
^Laing, R. D. (1969) [1959]. "The embodied and unembodied self". The Divided Self: An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness. Penguin Books. pp. 69, 73–74. ISBN978-0-14-013537-4. The unembodied self becomes hyper-conscious. [...] The self in such a schizoid organization is usually more or less unembodied. It is experienced as a mental entity. It enters the condition called by Kierkegaard 'shutupness'.
^Rodriguez, Leonardo (2001). "Autism and Childhood Psychosis". In Glowinski, Huguette; Marks, Zita M.; Murphy, Sara (eds.). A Compendium of Lacanian Terms. Free Association Books. pp. 26, 29–30. ISBN1-85343-538-4. Autism shows an extreme position of the fusion of the subject in the holophrase S1[:master signifier]S2[:Other] [...] [T]he signifier itself acquires the weight of the real.
^Leeb, Claudia (2008). "Toward a Theoretical Outline of the Subject: The Centrality of Adorno and Lacan for Feminist Political Theorizing". Political Theory. 36 (3): 351–376. doi:10.1177/0090591708315142. JSTOR20452637. S2CID145201953. Retrieved 2022-12-25. There are only few attempts to read Adorno in conjunction with Lacan, and this is the first work that shows the affinities between the non-identical and the Real. [...] The Real and the non-identical are then consistent with Adorno's notion of immanent critique. In contrast to a 'transcendent critique' that critiques other theories from outside its own principles, immanent critique unfolds through internal contradictions, which it does not aim to erase. Adorno, Negative Dialectics, 5.
^Deleuze, Gilles (1988) [1970]. Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. Translated by Hurley, Robert. City Lights Books. pp. 59, 62, 97. ISBN978-0-87286-218-0. Consciousness. [... includes] Reflection [...] Derivation [...and] Correlation[.] [...] Desire. Cf. Consciousness, Power [...] all power is inseparable from a capacity for being affected
^Gilbert-Rolfe, Jeremy (1997). "Blankness as a Signifier". Critical Inquiry. 24 (1): 159–175. doi:10.1086/448870. JSTOR1344162. S2CID161209057. Retrieved 2022-01-22. The face signifies by refusing to signify. [...] [Deleuze's] Bergsonianism...predicated on the idea of the surface—the plane and the point—as opposed to the form—the shape and its interior. [...] The passage from Victorian horror vacui to the present is that passage, the passage from potentiality to instantaneity. If in the former blankness was not a sign, but rather the place for the sign, in the latter it has become signally characteristic of the surface of all the signs which exclude it with recognizability and narrative[...][l]ying outside of art it would have to be art's subject.
^Deleuze, Gilles; Guattari, Félix (1987). "Year Zero: Faciality". A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Massumi, Brian. University of Minnesota Press. pp. 168, 171, 174. ISBN978-1-85168-637-7. The face constructs the wall that the signifier needs in order to bounce off of [...] The [Sartre] gaze is but secondary in relation to the gazeless eyes, to the black hole of faciality. The [Lacanian] mirror is but secondary in relation to the white wall of faciality [...] there is a face-landscape aggregate proper to the novel.
^Morrione, Deems D. (2006). "When Signifiers Collide: Doubling, Semiotic Black Holes, and the Destructive Remainder of the American Un/Real". Cultural Critique (63): 157–173. JSTOR4489250. Retrieved 2022-01-22. The semiotic black hole is[...]the destruction of the whole sign[...]that radically transforms the socius, possessing a gravitational pull that has the power to massively reshape and remotivate [...] the semiotic black hole[...][leaves] little or no trace of its influence. [...] a collision of a fatal event and a perfect object[.] [...] Temporality is constant motion; to mark a point in time is to freeze only that moment, to celebrate impression and deny expression.
^Dolar, Mladen (1991). ""I Shall Be with You on Your Wedding-Night": Lacan and the Uncanny". October. 58: 5–23. doi:10.2307/778795. JSTOR778795. Retrieved 2022-02-10. The mechanism of uncanniness doesn't leave you any space for uncertainty and hesitation. If there is a structural hesitation, or floating, attached to it, it comes from the impossibility of espousing the terrible certainty—it would ultimately entail psychosis, an annihilation of subjectivity.
^Bogue, Ronald (2003). Deleuze on Music, Painting and the Arts. Routledge. p. 90. ISBN978-0-415-96608-5.
^Dolar, Mladen (1991). ""I Shall Be with You on Your Wedding-Night": Lacan and the Uncanny". October. 58: 5–23. doi:10.2307/778795. JSTOR778795. Retrieved 2022-02-10. [T]he source of the uncanny is the reappearance of a part that was necessarily lost with the emergence of the subject—the intersection between the 'psychic' and the 'real,' the interior and the exterior, the 'word' and the 'object,' the symbol and the symbolized—the point where the real immediately coincides with the symbolic to be put into the service of the imaginary. [...] the uncanny is[...]the recuperation of the loss
^Parker, Ian (2011). "A clinic in the real: Relations". Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Revolutions in Subjectivity. Advancing Theory in Therapy. NY: Routledge. p. 190. ISBN978-0-415-45543-5. As an empty signifier, 'relation'[...][is found] between analysand and analyst, between infant and caregiver, between self and other, between individual and collective, between body and mind, between material and spiritual, between personal and political, and between clinic and world.
^Carroll, Noël (1990). "Why Horror: The Paradox of Horror: The Psychoanalysis of Horror". The Philosophy of Horror or Paradoxes of the Heart. New York, NY: Routledge. p. 175. ISBN0-415-90145-6. To experience the uncanny, then, is to experience something that is known, but something the knowledge of which has been hidden or repressed. Freud takes this to be a necessary, though not a sufficient condition, of the experience of the uncanny: '...the uncanny is nothing else than a hidden, familiar thing that has undergone repression and then emerged from it, and that everything that is uncanny fulfills this condition.'
^Guattari, Félix (2011) [1979]. "Introduction: Logos or Abstract Machines?". The Machinic Unconscious: Essays in Schizoanalysis. Semiotext(e) Foreign Agents Series. Translated by Adkins, Taylor. Semiotext(e). p. 14. ISBN978-1-58435-088-0.
^Guattari, Félix (2006) [1992]. Chaosmosis: an ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Translated by Bains, Paul; Pefanis, Julian. Power Publications. p. 9. ISBN978-0-909952-25-9. The term 'collective' should be understood in the sense of a multiplicity[.]
^Lefebvre, Henri (2002) [1974]. The Production of Space. Translated by Nicholson-Smith, Donald. Blackwell Publishing. p. 71. ISBN0-631-18177-6. Production in the Marxist sense transcends the philosophical opposition between 'subject' and 'object', along with all the relationships constructed by the philosophers on the basis of that opposition. [...] All productive activity is defined less by invariable or constant factors than by the incessant to-and-fro between temporality (succession, concatenation) and spatiality (simultaneity, synchronicity).
^Buchanan, Ian (2021). The Incomplete Project of Schizoanalysis. Edinburgh University Press. p. 195. ISBN978-1-4744-8789-4. The full body without organs is the soul animated by desire.
^Brown, William; Fleming, David H. (2011). "Deterritorialisation and Schizoanalysis in David Fincher's 'Fight Club'". Deleuze Studies. 5 (2, Special Issue on Schizoanalysis and Visual Culture): 275–299. doi:10.3366/dls.2011.0021. JSTOR45331462. Retrieved 2022-09-08. In Anti-Oedipus (1983), Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari advanced a radical conception of desire, no longer shackled to absence and lack, but based on a productive process of presence and becoming. [...] one in which the conventional distinctions between inside and outside, actual and virtual, and even between self and other significantly blur.
^Deleuze, Gilles; Guattari, Félix (1987). "On Several Regimes of Signs". A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Massumi, Brian. University of Minnesota Press. pp. 136–142. ISBN978-1-85168-637-7. transformations that blow apart semiotics systems or regimes of signs on the plane of consistency of a positive absolute deterritorialization are called diagrammatic. [...] An abstract machine [...] is diagrammatic [...] It operates by matter, not by substance.; by function, not by form. [...] The abstract machine is pure Matter-Function [...] A diagram has neither substance nor form, neither content nor expression. [...] Writing now functions on the same level as the real, and the real materially writes. [...] This Real-Abstract is totally different from the fictitious abstraction of a supposedly pure machine of expression. It is Absolute, but one that is neither undifferentiated nor transcendent. [...] there are no regimes of signs on the diagrammatic level, or on the plane of consistency, because form of expression is no longer really distinct from form of content.
^de Luque, Juan Luis Pérez (August 2013). Joshi, S.T. (ed.). "Lovecraft, Reality, and the Real: A Žižekian Approach". Lovecraft Annual (7). Hippocampus Press: 187–203. ISSN1935-6102. JSTOR26868476. Žižek...divides the Real into three different categories, which coincide with the imaginary/real/symbolic division: 'There are thus THREE modalities[...]the 'real Real'[...]'symbolic Real'[...]'imaginary Real'[...]On Belief 82
^Lacan, Jacques (2006) [1966]. "On a Question Prior to Any Possible Treatment of Psychosis". Écrits. Translated by Fink, Bruce. W. W. Norton & Company. pp. 458–459, 462. ISBN978-0-393-32925-4. This [L] Schema signifies that the condition of the subject, S (neurosis or psychosis), depends on what unfolds in the Other, A. [...] a, his objects; a ', his ego, that is, his form as reflected in his objects; and A, the locus from which the question of his existence may arise for him. [...] The R schema, which represents the lines that condition the perceptum—in other words, the object—insofar as these lines circumscribe the field of reality rather than merely depending on it.
^Guattari, Félix (2006) [1992]. Chaosmosis: an ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Translated by Bains, Paul; Pefanis, Julian. Power Publications. p. 25. ISBN978-0-909952-25-9. It is in this zone of intersection that subject and object fuse and establish their foundations. [...] one can say that psychoanalysis is born at this point of object-subject fusion that we see at work in suggestion, hypnosis, and hysteria.
^Lewis, Michael (2008). "3 The real and the development of the imaginary". Derrida and Lacan: Another Writing. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 148–201. JSTOR10.3366/j.ctt1r2cj3.9. 'The real, which is to say impossible, Other of the Other' (SXXIII: 64) [...] [T]he phallus was already recognized as the hinge of the real and the symbolic. The phallus can occupy this position precisely because it has both a symbolic and an imaginary aspect. It is a product of the real, but it is an image of the symbolic.
^Žižek, Slavoj (2007). "Troubles with the Real: Lacan as a Viewer of Alien". How to Read Lacan. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 66. ISBN978-0-393-32955-1. [T]he scientific Real, the real of a formula that expresses nature's automatic and senseless functioning [...] [I]f we start with the Symbolic[...]we get language deprived of the wealth of its human sense, transformed into the Real of a meaningless formula[.]
^ abLacan, Jacques (2006) [1966]. "The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis". Écrits. Translated by Fink, Bruce. W. W. Norton & Company. pp. 255, 258, 261, 262, 264. ISBN978-0-393-32925-4. [T]he analyst's abstention—his refusal to respond[...][m]ore exactly, the junction between the symbolic and the real lies in this negativity[.] [...] Thus we see another moment...in which the symbolic and the real come together: in the function of time. [...] Punctuation, once inserted, establishes the meaning[.] [...] [D]eath instinct [...] [or] repetition automatism [...] This limit is death...the subject being understood as defined by his historicity. [...] the past which manifests itself in an inverted form in repetition. [...] [that] corresponds rather to the relational group that symbolic logic designates topologically as a ring.
^Vergote, Antoine (1983). "From Freud's 'Other Scene' to Lacan's 'Other'". In Smith, Joseph H.; Kerrigan, William (eds.). Interpreting Lacan. Psychiatry and the Humanities. Vol. 6. Yale University Press. p. 202. ISBN978-0-300-13581-7. No concatenation of signifiers ever really grasps exhaustively the being of an object. Thus, all discourse is metonymic. It refers us from signifier to signifier, in an endless path in which the reference to the object is abolished. The real is thus 'the impossible.'
^Žižek, Slavoj (1989). "Part II: Lack in the Other; Che Vuoi?". The Sublime Object of Ideology. Verso. pp. 103, 108. ISBN978-1-84467-300-1. Historical reality is of course always symbolized [...] the horizon of an ideological field of meaning, is supported by some 'pure' ['Lacanian master-signifier'], [a] meaningless 'signifier without the signified'.
^Heidegger, Martin (2008) [1962]. Being and Time. Translated by Macquarrie, John; Robinson, Edward. Harper Perennial Modern Thought. p. 41. ISBN978-0-06-157559-4. Dasein 'is' its past in the way of its own Being, which, to put it roughly, 'historicizes' out of its future on each occasion. [...] Dasein can discover tradition, preserve it, and study it explicitly.
^Casey, Edward S.; Woody, J. Melvin (1983). "Hegel, Heidegger, Lacan: The Dialectic of Desire". In Smith, Joseph H.; Kerrigan, William (eds.). Interpreting Lacan. Psychiatry and the Humanities. Vol. 6. Yale University Press. p. 78. ISBN978-0-300-13581-7. Hegel insists that the individual who fails to recognize his own historicity and sets himself up as a pure, autonomous ego, independent of the customs and culture of his society and era, is a stranger to himself.
^ abBoothby, Richard (2001). Freud as Philosopher: metapsychology after Lacan. Routledge. p. 271. ISBN0-415-92590-8. The differentiating action of [semiotic] demotivation is what Lacan refers to as symbolic castration. The task of castration[...]is to introduce a fundamental shift in the subject's relation to the image, that is, to relate the positional moment of the image to the dispositional horizon of a symbolic system.
^Guattari, Félix (2006) [1992]. Chaosmosis: an ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Translated by Bains, Paul; Pefanis, Julian. Power Publications. p. 24. ISBN978-0-909952-25-9. Expressive, linguistic and non-linguistic substances install themselves at the junction of discursive chains (belonging to a finite, performed world, the world of the Lacanian Other)[.]
^Lacan, Jacques (2006) [1966]. "The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire". Écrits. Translated by Fink, Bruce. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 675. ISBN978-0-393-32925-4. [A] permanent revisionism, so to speak, in which what is disturbing about truth is constantly being reabsorbed, truth being in itself but what is lacking in the realization of knowledge. [...] This is a real crisis, in which the imaginary is eliminated [castration] in engendering a new symbolic form[.]
^Stavrakakis, Yannis (2006). "Jacques Lacan (1901-81)". In Simons, Jon (ed.). Contemporary Critical Theorists: From Lacan to Said. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 18–33. ISBN9780748617197. JSTOR10.3366/j.ctvxcrrt8.6. ('quilting points' or 'nodal points' in Laclau and Mouffe's rendering). The point de capiton is the signifier which 'stops the otherwise endless movement (glissement) of the signification'.
^Lewis, Michael (2008). "3 The real and the development of the imaginary". Derrida and Lacan: Another Writing. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 148–201. JSTOR10.3366/j.ctt1r2cj3.9. The real-of-the-symbolic as the infinity of traces is domesticated and rendered intelligible as the real-of-the-imaginary. The real-of-the-imaginary is the object a, the cause of desire, depicted in the fantasy, which thus makes the absolutely unreachable infinity seem like something that could one day be attained, and that is desirable. The infinity of the trace is given a positive (imaginary) form as the regulative ideal that is the object of desire. The infinity of the real is rendered accessible to us as the infinite striving of desire. [...] ['T]he object of desire has no image' (SIX: 30/5/62).
^Žižek, Slavoj (2007). "Troubles with the Real: Lacan as a Viewer of Alien". How to Read Lacan. W. W. Norton & Company. pp. 62, 66. ISBN978-0-393-32955-1. [I]ts status is purely phantasmatic [...] [T]he terrifying formless Thing[...][I]f we start with the Imaginary (the mirror-confrontation of Freud and Irma), we get the Real in its imaginary dimension, the horrifying primordial image that cancels the [dream] imagery itself[.]
^Fink, Bruce (1997). A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Theory and Technique. Harvard University Press. pp. 38–39, 248. ISBN0-674-13536-9. When the analyst is viewed as an other like the analysand, the analyst can be considered an imaginary object or other for the analysand (Lacan writes this as a ' [...] Lacan puts it in italics to indicate that it is imaginary. In contrast to a ', the subject's own ego is denoted by a.) [...] When the analyst is viewed as the cause of the analysand's unconscious formations, the analyst can be considered a 'real' object for the analysand [...or] object a[.] [...] alter-ego, [is] a ' [.]
^Suvin, Darko (1987). "Approach to Topoanalysis and to the Paradigmatics of Dramaturgic Space". Poetics Today. 8 (2): 311–334. doi:10.2307/1773040. JSTOR1773040. Retrieved 2022-05-25. Fundamentally, any psychological image is a complex and autonomous reproduction 'not of the object itself but of the adjustments proper to the action which incides on the object'; in particular, 'the intuition of space is not a reading of the objects' properties but right from the start it is clearly an action exerted on them' (Piaget & Inhelder 1972:342 and 523).
^Hurst, Andrea (2008). "7 The Lacanian Real". Derrida Vis-à-vis Lacan: Interweaving Deconstruction and Psychoanalysis. Fordham University Press. pp. 213–236. ISBN9780823228744. JSTORj.ctt13x0dc2.14. [T]he dream imagery (as the counterpart of conscious representation according to the causality of the automaton), puts together 'what happened' (as 'event,' 'trauma,' 'knot,' 'navel,' or the Real) according to the causality of the tuché, as the cause of the repetition compulsion.
^Crockett, Clayton (2007). "3 Desiring the Thing: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis". Interstices of the Sublime: Theology and Psychoanalytic Theory. Fordham University Press. pp. 37–50. ISBN9780823227211. JSTORj.ctt13x03fr.7. The Thing is not the object (the vase) but the emptiness that is represented by the object in order for it to function in symbolic discourse. [...] This emptiness is a hole that marks the Real.
^Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1999) [1922]. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by Ogden, C.K. Dover Publications. pp. 38, 50, 74. ISBN978-0-486-40445-5. 3.221 Objects[,] I can only name. Signs represent them. I can only speak of them. [...] 4.0621 [that] the signs 'p' and '~p' can say the same thing is important, for it shows that the sign '~' corresponds to nothing in [ontic] reality. [...] 5.44 And if there was an object called '~', then '~~p' would have to say something other than 'p'.
^Fink, Bruce (1995). "There's No Such Thing as a Sexual Relationship". The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton University Press. p. 102. ISBN978-0-691-01589-7. [O]bject (a) [...] as real, does not signify anything: it is the Other's desire, it is desirousness as real, not signified.
^Žižek, Slavoj (2007). "Troubles with the Real: Lacan as a Viewer of Alien". How to Read Lacan. W. W. Norton & Company. pp. 72, 73. ISBN978-0-393-32955-1. [I]t is not an external thing that resists being caught in the symbolic network, but the fissure within the symbolic network itself. [...] [F]or Lacan the Real—the Thing—is not so much the inert presence that curves symbolic space (introducing gaps and inconsistencies in it), but, rather, an effect of these gaps and inconsistencies.
^Boothby, Richard (2001). Freud as Philosopher: metapsychology after Lacan. Routledge. pp. 49, 50. ISBN0-415-92590-8. In 'The Thing,' Heidegger develops an example[...]the earthen jug. [...] In fashioning the jug, the potter forms the clay around a void. It is this central void that makes the jug useful. [...] All emergence of truth thus occurs against a background of untruth. Alethia presupposes a prior lethe, or primordial forgetting.
^Fink, Bruce (1997). A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Theory and Technique. Harvard University Press. p. 45. ISBN0-674-13536-9. [T]he analyst being identified as the one who knows (the full vase) whereas the analysand (the empty vase) knows nothing but what the analyst communicates.
^Camus, Albert (1983) [1955]. The Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays. Translated by O'Brien, Justin. Vintage International. pp. 113–114. ISBN978-0-679-73373-7. To work and create 'for nothing,' to sculpture in clay, to know that one's creation has no future, to see one's work destroyed in a day while being aware that fundamentally this has no more importance than building for centuries—this is the difficult wisdom that absurd thought sanctions. Performing these two tasks simultaneously, negating on the one hand and magnifying on the other, is the way open to the absurd creator. He must give the void its colors.
^Kristeva, Julia (2002) [1989]. "Black Sun". In Oliver, Kelly (ed.). The Portable Kristeva. European Perspectives (updated ed.). Columbia University Press. p. 187. ISBN0-231-12629-8. [T]he Thing is an imagined sun, bright and black at the same time. 'It is a well-known fact that one never sees the sun in a dream[.'] [...] The melancholy Thing interrupts desiring metonymy, just as it prevents working out the loss within the psyche.
^Deleuze, Gilles; Guattari, Félix (1987). "Becoming-Intense, Becoming-Animal, Becoming-Imperceptible...". A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Massumi, Brian. University of Minnesota Press. p. 245. ISBN978-1-85168-637-7. Lovecraft applies the term 'Outsider' to this thing or entity, the Thing, which arrives and passes at the edge, which is linear yet multiple, 'teeming, seething, swelling, foaming, spreading like an infectious disease, this nameless horror.' [...] a phenomenon of bordering.
^Lacan, Jacques (2006) [1966]. "On a Question Prior to Any Possible Treatment of Psychosis". Écrits. Translated by Fink, Bruce. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 460. ISBN978-0-393-32925-4. The [Jungian] anima, like a rubber band, snaps back to the animus and the animus to the animal, who between S and a maintains considerably closer 'foreign relations' with its Umwelt than our own[.]
^Becker, Ernest (1973). The Denial of Death. Free Press Paperbacks. pp. 145, 146, 148. ISBN978-0-684-83240-1. In Rank's words the transference object comes to represent for the individual 'the great biological forces of nature, to which the ego binds itself emotionally and which then form the essence of the human and his fate.' [...] The object becomes his locus of safe operation. [...] Angyal could well say that transference is...the experience of the other as one's whole world [...] this fear of looking the transference object full in the face is...the fear of the reality of intense focalization of natural wonder and power; the fear of being overwhelmed by the truth of the universe as it exists, as that truth is focused in one human face.
^Rank, Otto (1932). Art and Artist: Creative Urge and Personality Development. Translated by Atkinson, Charles Francis. W. W. Norton & Company. pp. 104, 105, 106, 110, 370. ISBN978-0-393-30574-6. Plato's definition[...]of art—which is really but the reflection of his whole picture of life; for does he not explain daily life as the shadow of an actual reality, which he calls the Idea, and does not art therefore naturally represent for him only a shadow of that shadow, a copy of a copy? [...] Ideas, which leads him to interpret the soul's intuition of self-beauty[...]as the recollection of its prenatal existence[...]the prenatal—that is, a supernatural—state [...] a plane of illusion, which has its setting and its pattern in our own soul-life. [...] the feeling of oneness with the soul living in the work of art, a greater and higher entity. [...] This ideologization of inner conflicts manifests itself in the individual in a form which psycho-analysis has called that of 'identification'[.]
^Boothby, Richard (2001). Freud as Philosopher: metapsychology after Lacan. Routledge. p. 278. ISBN0-415-92590-8. The art object, says Lacan in his definition of sublimation, 'raises the object to the dignity of the Thing.'
^Lewis, Michael (2008). "3 The real and the development of the imaginary". Derrida and Lacan: Another Writing. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 148–201. JSTOR10.3366/j.ctt1r2cj3.9. [T]he real-of-the-symbolic is the letter, while the real-of-the-imaginary is the objet petit a
^Seaman, Robert E. (1989). "Lacan, Poe, and the Descent of the Self". Texas Studies in Literature and Language. 31 (2): 196–214. JSTOR40754889. Retrieved 2022-05-15. [T]he fisherman's drama may be seen as a drama of the mirror stage in reverse, a regression from the symbolic phase to the imaginary. [...] instead of looking into the mirror, the fisherman looks around it at its silver backing, perceiving the mechanism by which the illusion of his self is created. [...] the return of mythical and imaginative knowledge. [...] It is a mystical quest for the Other[.] [...] The Maelstrom is the object of the fisherman's quest, but it is also a death object and the locus of the eternal slippage of meaning. [...] [it] cannot be reduced to a signified, to a referent.
^McWilliams, Nancy (2020) [2011]. Psychoanalytic Diagnosis: Understanding Personality Structure in the Clinical Diagnosis (second ed.). The Guilford Press. p. 19. ISBN978-1-4625-4369-4. Diagnosis can, like anything else, be used as a defense against anxiety about the unknown. [...] When any label obscures more than it illuminates, the practitioner is better off discarding it and relying on common sense and decency, like the lost sailor who throws away a useless navigational chart and reverts to orienting by a few familiar stars.
Lerner, Pablo (2024) [2023]. Speculating on the Edge of Psychoanalysis: Rings and Voids. The Lines of the Symbolic in Psychoanalysis Series. doi:10.4324/9781003278740. ISBN978-1-03-224477-8.
.jpeg)
