Share to: share facebook share twitter share wa share telegram print page

Template talk:Protected areas of Texas

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mcorazao-2009-12-15T22:01:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Size-2009-12-15T22:01:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mcorazao-2009-12-15T22:01:00.000Z-Size"],"text":"Size","linkableTitle":"Size"}-->

Size

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mcorazao-2009-12-15T22:01:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Size-2009-12-15T22:01:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mcorazao-2009-12-15T22:01:00.000Z-Size"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mcorazao-2009-12-15T22:01:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Size-2009-12-15T22:01:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mcorazao-2009-12-15T22:01:00.000Z-Size"],"text":"Size","linkableTitle":"Size"}-->

Comment: Anybody think this template is a little big? I don't know if there is any guideline for navboxes but this one has become larger than most. It would seem a shame to remove any of the sections but I wonder if the State Parks and Natural Areas and State Historic Sites sections could be modified to just list a few of the largest and then point to the list articles.

Just a thought ...

--Mcorazao (talk) 22:01, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-12-15T22:01:00.000Z","author":"Mcorazao","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mcorazao-2009-12-15T22:01:00.000Z-Size","replies":["c-Jllm06-2009-12-16T02:47:00.000Z-Mcorazao-2009-12-15T22:01:00.000Z"]}}-->

I made the template collapse automatically. This will help it from overwhelming an article until needed. It's useful to have all the listings together. Jllm06 (talk) 02:47, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-12-16T02:47:00.000Z","author":"Jllm06","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Jllm06-2009-12-16T02:47:00.000Z-Mcorazao-2009-12-15T22:01:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mcorazao-2010-01-04T23:39:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Historical_sites-2010-01-04T23:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mcorazao-2010-01-04T23:39:00.000Z-Historical_sites"],"text":"Historical sites","linkableTitle":"Historical sites"}-->

Historical sites

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mcorazao-2010-01-04T23:39:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Historical_sites-2010-01-04T23:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mcorazao-2010-01-04T23:39:00.000Z-Historical_sites"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Mcorazao-2010-01-04T23:39:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Historical_sites-2010-01-04T23:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-Mcorazao-2010-01-04T23:39:00.000Z-Historical_sites"],"text":"Historical sites","linkableTitle":"Historical sites"}-->

Question/comment: I just added El Orcoquisac to the section for National Historic Sites. But I am not sure if this was really correct. That is, what is the scope of that sub-section? El Orcoquisac is listed in the NRHP but I don't think it is categorized as a "park" by the NPS (but the NPS still manages in some fashion though I do not know the particulars). There are a lot of other sites on the NRHP which fall into a similar category and are not in this template ...

--Mcorazao (talk) 23:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-04T23:39:00.000Z","author":"Mcorazao","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Mcorazao-2010-01-04T23:39:00.000Z-Historical_sites","replies":[]}}-->

Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya