Template talk:London Underground rolling stock

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: Rapid transit / in UK Trains Portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Associated projects or task forces: /  This template is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit. This template is supported by WikiProject UK Railways. London Transport This template is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles

I changed the link on the template from the dab page to the most recent info on TfL. Feel free to leave me a message please if there's a better solution. --AndrewHowse (talk) 15:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-12-18T15:28:00.000Z","author":"AndrewHowse","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-AndrewHowse-2007-12-18T15:28:00.000Z-London_Transport_disambiguation","replies":[]}}-->

IS there a more efficient way of displaying this data? maybe splinting it into currently used and unused stock

this could even start by colour coding? acasperw (talk) 15:35, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-02-02T15:35:00.000Z","author":"Acasperw","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Acasperw-2008-02-02T15:35:00.000Z-more_efficient","replies":[]}}-->

Hate this new template, it looks clumsy, especially compared to the older one. Do we really need so an ugly box at the bottom of each page? Jsp3970 (talk) 16:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-03-17T16:56:00.000Z","author":"Jsp3970","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jsp3970-2008-03-17T16:56:00.000Z-Template","replies":[]}}-->

I think we should have one row for current rolling stock, split into deep tube and sub surface, and former rolling stock in a separate row, similar to Template:NYCS rolling stock ElshadK (talk) 12:13, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-12-02T12:13:00.000Z","author":"ElshadK","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ElshadK-2018-12-02T12:13:00.000Z-Suggestion","replies":[]}}-->