Template talk:Brisbane landmarks

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Brisbane / Queensland Brisbane landmarks is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles This template is supported by the Brisbane task force. This template is supported by WikiProject Queensland.

To improve navigatibility of this template, I propose to link the heading for |group1=, "Buildings & structures", to be linked to Category:Buildings and structures in Brisbane. Any objections?

Also, in line with MOS:HEAD, I think the group headings should not be be written in title case but in sentence case; thus: "Buildings & structures", "Nature and parks", "Cultural institutions". -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:54, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-08-13T00:54:00.000Z","author":"Michael Bednarek","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Michael_Bednarek-2009-08-13T00:54:00.000Z-Category_for_\"Buildings_&_Structures\"","replies":[]}}-->

Maybe this template should have a former or historical section for places that have been demolished such as Brisbane Festival Hall and Cloudland. - Shiftchange (talk) 11:48, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-23T11:48:00.000Z","author":"Shiftchange","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Shiftchange-2010-01-23T11:48:00.000Z-New_section","replies":["c-Michael_Bednarek-2010-01-24T06:53:00.000Z-Shiftchange-2010-01-23T11:48:00.000Z","c-Shiftchange-2010-01-24T12:53:00.000Z-Shiftchange-2010-01-23T11:48:00.000Z"]}}-->

Maybe they should have been left in the template? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:53, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-24T06:53:00.000Z","author":"Michael Bednarek","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Michael_Bednarek-2010-01-24T06:53:00.000Z-Shiftchange-2010-01-23T11:48:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Yes, either way their inclusion has merit. - Shiftchange (talk) 12:53, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-24T12:53:00.000Z","author":"Shiftchange","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Shiftchange-2010-01-24T12:53:00.000Z-Shiftchange-2010-01-23T11:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-Figaro-2010-01-24T13:36:00.000Z-Shiftchange-2010-01-24T12:53:00.000Z"]}}-->

I have just returned them both to their former position in the template. As mentioned, it might be a good idea to create a special historical section for these buildings, as well as for other demolished buidlings of interest. Figaro (talk) 13:36, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-24T13:36:00.000Z","author":"Figaro","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Figaro-2010-01-24T13:36:00.000Z-Shiftchange-2010-01-24T12:53:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Should the Brisbane Powerhouse occur twice on the one template? The Arts and Culture sections is probably best as it is more general. - Shiftchange (talk) 10:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-06-30T10:50:00.000Z","author":"Shiftchange","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Shiftchange-2010-06-30T10:50:00.000Z-Brisbane_Powerhouse","replies":[]}}-->

Sport is on here twice.

I am removing one of them.144.137.191.8 (talk) 06:09, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-11-08T06:09:00.000Z","author":"144.137.191.8","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-144.137.191.8-2014-11-08T06:09:00.000Z-Sport","replies":[]}}-->