This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Poetry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Children's literature Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Tasks you can do: edit history watch purge Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks. Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles. Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}} Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project. Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject. References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs. Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature Stubs: Improve a stub-class article edit

The article is weak and poorly referenced; it reads more like a personal reflection. The claim that the poem is an example of concrete poetry is anachronistic; though there was shaped poetry elsewhere in Europe in the 19th century, the kinship between Carroll's poem and that needs a proper reference. The final reference concerning multiple meanings is little more than an anecdote that appeared in a university fly-sheet and is not an acceptable academic reference. Unless these issues are addressed, the article as it stands is an obvious candidate for deletion. Sweetpool50 (talk) 12:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"though there was shaped poetry elsewhere in Europe in the 19th century, the kinship between Carroll's poem and that needs a proper reference" I provided one.Robert P. O'Shea (talk) 06:16, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"The final reference concerning multiple meanings is little more than an anecdote that appeared in a university fly-sheet and is not an acceptable academic reference" I provided another secondary citation from the New York Times and the primary citation.Robert P. O'Shea (talk) 06:56, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The illustration claims to be from the 1865 printing. This seems unlikely if a comparison is made with the image (claimed 1866) at ^[1] which is referenced at the end of the article. Even allowing for there being different US and UK editions the significantly different line breaks as well as the typeface used mean that more evidence is needed that this really is 1865 and not a much later reprint. 78.145.166.42 (talk) 16:36, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]