Talk:SourcePuller

Reverse engineering, or "reverse engineering"?

The article currently says

SourcePuller [...] was originally developed by Andrew Tridgell, who reverse engineered the BitKeeper protocol [...]

This is sourced to an LWN article ([1]) titled "How Tridge reverse engineered BitKeeper". However if you read this (very short) article, then you'll realize that the headline is actually tongue in cheek.

Tridgell merely connected to the BK server, typed in "help", got a short list of commands/explanations that included "clone - clone the current repository", typed "clone", and got the repo data. This isn't "reverse engineering" in any sense even remotely close to the usual sense of the term, contrary to Larry McVoy's claims at the time.

I think Wikipedia should be a bit more careful when reproducing claims by parties with a vested interest (such as McVoy's claim here). And LWN should perhaps be a bit more careful with its headlines, since sarcasm isn't always obvious... but that's for them to fix, not us.

I'll fix the article by attributing the "reverse engineering" claim to McVoy explicitly. Feel free to improve the article further, of course. 188.108.115.31 (talk) 12:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.