Talk:Softbox

The comparison image isn't very useful - a better comparison would be using a direct flash compared to using a softbox, and the photos are composed differently, with different focal lengths. As it is it's really just showing the advantage of flash versus no flash. 121.45.221.44 (talk) 01:56, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider the image on the right
A comparison of a photograph taken with softbox (top) and direct flash (bottom) image.
to illustrate this article. The top image was taken using a small (12X16) softbox positioned approximately 24 inches from the top of the subject (apple and plum). The bottom image was taken using the same flash and positioning but without the softbox. Additional technical information can be included if necessary. Dazzpedian (talk) 06:30, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As you say "it's really just showing the advantage of flash versus no flash", I'd argue it's much worse. This picture is artificially exaggerating the differences, as the two parts are shot from different angles: Without the softbox the model's head is close to the horizon, with drab clouds giving a bright background with the model lacking fill-in light to the point it looks underexposed. Now compare the one with the softbox, which is taken from a much lower angle: The well-lit head is against the blue sky above the clouds, possibly further darkened by using a polariser. This comparison is wildly unfair and as such doing this article a disservice. Good reason to take it out, as I'll do right now.WikiPidi (talk) 12:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Light Umbrella

Searching for Light Umbrella redirects to this article. Light Umbrellas and Soft Boxes are subtlety different things. Maybe another article should be written for light umbrellas. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.32.4.83 (talk) 18:01, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.