This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance). Computer graphics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article claims that the Octane is a SMP machine, but since it also claims that it was based on the Origin 2000, this should not be the case. If the HEART ASIC is the same as the Hub ASIC used in the Origin 2000, then the two processors 'sharing' the one 'bus' should run in a multiplexed fashion like the Origin 2000. Also, I think that there are two points that need to be clarified: Xtalk, I believe, refers to the I/O subsystem architecture, not the system architecture itself. The XBOW ASIC is not the heart of the Octane, that would be the HEART ASIC. The XBOW ASIC is the same as that used in the Origin 2000, and that is just a crossbar that routes XIO packets. Rilak (talk) 07:50, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The text used to say:

The Octane supports 256 MB to 8 GB of system memory, using proprietary 200-pin DIMMs. There are two system board revisions. The first revision (part number 030-0887-003, easily distinguished with its black handle) supports 2 GB of RAM, while the second (part number 030-1467-001, with a silver handle) allows up to 8 GB. The memory subsystem has vast reserves of bandwidth that can be directly served by the Xbow router to any XIO card.

Black and silver handle not valid for identifying system board, I am holding in my hand a P/N 030-1467-001 with a black handle->that must be revaluated, and can`t be generalised so much u negate the usual Octane1/2 mobo visual recognition !!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.2.44.108 (talk • contribs) 78.2.44.108

I removed the link to Cray CX1 - Octane and Octane2 are totally different. If an Octane III article will be created it should be linked to the CX1. GL1zdA (talk) 15:47, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, this is the best workstation/desktop computer I have ever used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.224.54.157 (talk) 08:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the reference to SMP to multiprocessing. AFAIK, "SMP" refers to an Intel specification - the Octane is based on the Origin 2000 which has as much to do with Intel as grapefruit has to do with Toyota. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.65.91.78 (talk) 06:47, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The audio system in the Octane is really top-notch. I'm not a golden-ethernet cable audiophile by any stretch, but the sound quality on this machine is just simply supurb. Easily a peer to Hammerfall-type hardware and I wouldn't be surprised if Octane can one-up RME on latency given the Origin vs. PC roots of this system.

This is such a "sleeper" computer and I'm suprised there really isn't any type of "community" around these machines like the Amiga, etc. 24.51.217.118 (talk) 17:39, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]