This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Rivers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Lancashire and Cumbria High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. UK geography Mid‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Yorkshire Low‑importance River Ribble is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm removing the claim Ther Are Plans To Have A Bridge From Lytham Nere Blackpool to Southport as I see no logical reason for it to have any basis and it was added by a user who has been busy adding invented bridges across the country. If anyone knows anything about this claim please add details - such as who is reponsible for these plans.--JBellis 18:37, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I find it rather strange that the sections for tributaries include Whalley to Barnoldswick and Barnoldswick to Source. Barnoldswick is not on the Ribble, it's about 4 miles from it, surely it would make more sense to use Paythorne as a break.Gawthorpe Dave 12:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced Barnoldswick with Paythorne. Thanks for pointing out my error! Theelf29 (talk) 01:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved mention of most of the tributaries to List of tributaries of the River Ribble in an attempt to declutter the article. Longwayround (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The tributaries list and, indeed, many of the individual pages for tributaries has no references. I'm concerned that they may be deleted if none can be found on ground of non-notability. Is anyone able to assist? Longwayround (talk) 14:02, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe there could be a section on the history of flooding and that the river is at flood risk every year? here is the latest one!^[1] Bankhallbretherton (talk) 23:18, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see that the pdf reference states the source as the confluence of Cam Beck and Gayle Beck, but Ordnance Survey maps show the Ribble labelled for a long way after the Cam beck joins the waterway. I would suggest that Ribble Head should be the actual source as indicated on the maps. Discussion needed.Rimmer1993 (talk) 11:30, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:River Ribble/CommentsTalk:River Ribble/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 15:02, 6 August 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 04:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

AlexRover (talk) 15:23, 18 February 2018 (UTC) I believe this page should be merged with the page List of tributaries of the River Ribble, owing to the fact that page is poorly sourced and would fit into this page under a subheading.[reply]

I believe that article was previously created from this one. Although how it has survived with any sources for so long is a mystery. An alternative method has been employed at River Irwell, but just merging that un-sourced data back into this article is hardly the best course of action. Does anyone have any ideas as to suitable sources, the relevant OS map is a start.TiB chat 16:18, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AlexRover (talk) 17:46, 18 February 2018 (UTC) The River Irwell page seems to be a good model for integration which will stop the article becoming cluttered like before. The relevant OS map is this https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/getoutside/local/bottoms-ribble-valley I believe although the OS website can just be cited as well.[reply]

• Don't merge - as per TiB, merging the list back into the article is not the best idea. I've added a set of references to the lead of the list which show the direct tributaries...Jokulhlaup (talk) 14:59, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. It would make this article unwieldy. The list is both trivial and too much detail. Despite the sources added to the list, I think it should go to AfD after this discussion closes. Thanks. Izzat Kutebar (talk) 21:42, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A figure is given in the infobox for the length of the Ribble (121km / 75 miles) but no source is given for that figure. The River Ribble factsheet published by the Mersey Basin Campaign (note 4, 2015) states its length as '110km from source to sea' (it defines the start as the confluence of Gayle Beck and Cam Beck though doesn't define what is meant by 'sea', a pertinent matter in view of its funnel-shaped estuary). Due to this uncertainty I have, as with some other watercourses where dubious lengths have been asserted, painstakingly measured its length on online 1:25,000 scale OS mapping using a digital tool and determined it at 129.6km / 80.6 miles ('physical river' definition, using the start of its longest tributary, Jam Sike as the source) which works out at 117.7km / 73.1 miles for a confluence start ('named river' definition), both using the county limit as the finish - I'd be confident of the accuracy of the figure to within about 0.5%. All of this is of course original research on my part so cannot be included in the article but it does at least give an idea of what a true figure should look like if and when an editor finds a suitable reference out there! cheers Geopersona (talk) 09:28, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which lakes it flows through 86.8.171.141 (talk) 14:07, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]