This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Whoever added the section 'sources' misunderstands what the term means on wikipedia. Its not for 'places to buy stuff' ie adverts.... --82.226.191.237 19:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It probably would be helpful to include a section on Ring Flash Adapters. They fall under the Ring Flash category but are different then traditional ring flashes. It uses the light emitted from a hot-shoe flash unit and bends the light around the lens via fiber optics.

Nickolai99 (talk) 05:26, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"It is considered to be a particularly good source of fill light because it does not create its own new set of shadows." Only partly true, all light sources have the ability to create shadows. A ring flash creates a shadow directly behind the subject, so incorrect usage (ie too strong fill) can create conflicting shadows with other off-axis lights, especially if the subject is close to a background and that background is poorly lit by the other lights. Maxzom (talk) 12:33, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How does the photograph illustrate what a ring flash is, or what one looks like. Come on people use some common sense. Photography is about communication, the photograph does not illustrate what the item is.69.165.153.200 (talk) 21:07, 4 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.165.153.200 (talk)

If you're referring to the silly picture of the camera dangling from a tripod, I agree. Whoever posted that image could just as well have posted an image of a cigar box and claimed that there was a "ring flash" inside it. — Quicksilver^{T @} 21:58, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]