The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 17:27, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Riddlesdown Common → Riddlesdown (open space) – The official name of this open space is Riddlesdown, not Riddlesdown Common. It may be known as Riddlesdown Common to many locally, but on the City of London and London Borough of Croydon websites, and on the signage on Riddlesdown itself, it is called just "Riddlesdown". More importantly, it is NOT legally designated as common land, so it is wrong to refer to it as a common. I propose that this article should either be subsumed within the existing "Riddlesdown" article (which refers mainly to the Riddlesdown suburban area), or if it is desired to keep it as a separate article then "Riddlesdown (open space)". Lonegroover (talk) 17:14, 5 April 2020 (UTC) Lonegroover (talk) 17:14, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would oppose a merge as the suburb is a separate subject, but I would be happy with a change of name. I do not see the need for brackets and I would prefer Riddlesdown open space. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:52, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose as the current title seems to be adequate WP:NATURALDIS. The "(open space)" disambiguator is pretty unappealing comparably. Perhaps Riddlesdown (London City Commons) or similar, but now we're just getting less WP:CONCISE for little benefit. -- Netoholic @ 04:00, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.