Talk:Remote Shell

Category: Unix Shells?

Can you really call rsh a Unix Shell? It's not a Unix Shell in the sense that bash or zsh are Unix Shells, it's a communication tool for logging in to a machine or executing a command over a network. rsh doesn't interpret the commands you send, it simply sends them over and the command shell on the remote system interprets them...

The KontrolPack link seems to be spam. But it's been there for years. Has it been taken over, or was it always spam? 192.203.187.55 (talk) 20:34, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As of this writing, the link is not recorded at the article. It was removed at Revision as of 20:43, 19 March 2012. I have not checked if it was not added and removed since 19 March 2012. I have edited the title of this section appropriately. I am not the user who started this section. ~2026-76247-6 (talk) 01:05, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The article states "rexec has the same kind of functionality that rsh has : you can execute shell commands on a remote computer. The main difference is that rexecd authenticates by reading the username and password (unencrypted) from the socket." and nothing else. I think we can safely merge those two stubs together. Not that any has a strong case to pass WP:GNG, but... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:46, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Darwin man page is dead, please refer to https://linux.die.net/man/1/rsh or a GNU manual entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.226.12.99 (talk) 23:19, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possible merge with Shell shoveling?

Shell shoveling might be worth merging, please discuss. Holzklöppel (talk) 20:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.