Raging Bully has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 20, 2010 Good article nominee Listed May 1, 2026 Good article reassessment Kept
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Disney Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Animation: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article has been selected for use on the Animation portal. Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Raging Bully/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: J Milburn (talk) 00:30, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

You can be assured a neutral if slightly clueless review, as I have never actually heard of this show :)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Generally very nice, a few points listed below

   B. MoS compliance:

   Ditto

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Not certain about the DVD Verdict site, but the others look great. I'm happy to let that slip here, but be aware that people may be more harsh at FAC, if you plan to take this there.

   I believe DVD Verdict stands as quite a reliable DVD review website; each review is clearly well-researched and neutral (well, by a critic's standard that is) The Flash ^{talk} 02:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Great image choice, a very good fair use rationale on the infobox image. Both add considerably to the article.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• mall is a dablink

•  Done The Flash ^{talk} 02:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Could we have the names of the minor characters linking to a character list, if one exists? If not, then it's fine how it is, context is provided.

•  Done The Flash ^{talk} 02:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "laugh at him" At Buford, or Phineas?

•  Done (Buford) The Flash ^{talk} 02:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "Buford accepts and Holyfield helps Phineas train for the match, despite warnings from Phineas' friends Baljeet and Isabella, through simple tasks, like punching a chain of sausages, climbing up a down escalator, or playing Dance Dance Revolution." That sentence could do with rewriting.

•  Done (I think) The Flash ^{talk} 02:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• If something belongs to Phineas, it is Phineas's, not Phineas'- the only exception is Jesus (and yeah, I accept that that's a pretty ridiculous rule). Possibly different in American English, but I don't think so.

•  Done The Flash ^{talk} 02:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "secretly a secret agent" Redundant word is redundant. Perhaps "who is, unbeknownst to Phineas, a secret agent"

•  Done The Flash ^{talk} 02:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "Phineas' is" No need for an apostrophe here

•  Done The Flash ^{talk} 02:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "who take over" Who took over?

•  Done (I changed it to "manages, is that okay?) The Flash ^{talk} 02:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "himself, who appears" change to "himself, appearing"

•  Done The Flash ^{talk} 02:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "match with Buford" Against Buford

•  Done The Flash ^{talk} 02:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Even if the other episodes do not have articles, they should be linked- redlinks are not necessarily a bad thing. Alternatively, they could be turned into redirects to the episode list page if you really don't want redlinks. This includes the infobox episodes.

•  Done The Flash ^{talk} 02:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "Ed Liu, of Toon Zone, wrote that the episode and others included on the DVD The Fast and the Phineas were way too manic for their own good, never giving a gag enough time to develop a proper laugh before ripping off to the next one,"" Quote marks don't open, they just close

•  Done The Flash ^{talk} 02:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "the "He's a Bully" montage" I'm assuming that's the training montage, but could you specify that?

•  Done The Flash ^{talk} 02:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• The formatting on ref one is a little odd- only the DVD name should be in italics.

• The template actually automatically does that. The Flash ^{talk} 03:00, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a lot better than I expected it to be- very well considered, written and researched. I would be more than happy to promote once the small issues above are resolved. Feel free to drop a note on my talk page when you make the changes, though I will be watching this page. J Milburn (talk) 00:30, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! :) The Flash ^{talk} 02:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed one dablink, and I'm now happy to promote. Nice work! J Milburn (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Raging Bully. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:JfWKZXi2BtIJ:www.disneychannelmedianet.com/DNR/2008/doc/PhineasandFerbEpisodicLaunch.doc to http://www.disneychannelmedianet.com/assets/pr%5Chtml/PAF_020108.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:42, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Raging Bully. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.dvdtown.com/review/phineas-and-ferb-tv-show/dvd/6123/2
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091116061058/http://disneymusic.disney.go.com/albums/phineasandferb.html to http://disneymusic.disney.go.com/albums/phineasandferb.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://news.toonzone.net/articles/25253/phineas-amp-ferb-the-fast-and-the-phineas-is-2-fast-kinda-phunny

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Raging Bully. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090928082755/http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/fastandphineas.php to http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/fastandphineas.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article, like "Are You My Mummy?", hasn't aged well. First, it seems too short for a GA (and I think it should be removed). Second, it uses unreliable sources like Zap2it, DVD Town, Ultimate Disney, and Disney Music, and it relies primarily on the DVD commentary. Furthermore, I don't think this article should even exist; it has very little information about the episode, and the "Reception" section is too short. ~2026-24879-9 (talk) 18:55, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I will call user @Gommeh: to see if the item still meets the requirements or if he will issue a GAR? ~2026-23638-12 (talk) 19:01, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]