Talk:Perfect Celebrity

References

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle talk 18:18, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(
)
  • Reviewed:
Created by Leafy46 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Leafy46 (talk) 04:36, 9 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article was created within 7 days of nomination. Article has over 1,500 characters. Article is properly cited. Earwig returned an unlikely copyright violation of 11.5%. A QPQ is not needed at this time. My only concern at this time is that the article is tagged with notability issues by RachelTensions. Once they have been resolved, I think it's good to go. lullabying (talk) 23:39, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Page Curation note

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The article's sources do not yet reflect significant coverage of the song outside of the context of coverage of the album as a whole, or reviews of the project. See WP:NSONG for the specific guideline. "Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. RachelTensions (talk) 14:56, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI to anyone coming by, I've decided to remove this tag for the reason I've put in this comment on my talk page. I've added in a few of the extra sources I've found just to play it safe, but I'd argue that there were already a good amount of sources speaking specifically about the song before, and that there are definitely enough now. Leafy46 (talk) 16:17, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That’s fine with me. When I reviewed the article originally there was only one source cited that was actually on the song in-specific and not coverage of the album as a whole. Looks like things have expanded now.
RachelTensions (talk) 19:29, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.