Talk:Nice Peter
| This article was nominated for deletion on 1 November 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
This page should NOT be Deleted because it was mostly Independently Done then who ever did it knows alot about Him.I`ve Read it and Everything Is Correct.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.129.62.98 (talk • contribs)
- If you want your opinion to count, you should express it on the AfD page linked to on the front page. The Jade Knight (talk) 20:27, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Semiprotection
I looked in the history, and I found a lot of people claiming to have reverted "vandalism." It's no surprise--this page gets vandalized daily. I'm no admin, but I request Semiprotection.
ObiwanLostToBarney (talk) 02:30, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
| I think there is great scope to improve this article. And as you say, this article should be semi-protected. I will try to draw some admin's attention to it Harsh2580 (talk) 15:40, 8 May 2012 (UTC)] |
Versus
Another common example of the same link in the same section. I am reverting this.
Walex03 W (talk) 02:38, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Someone already did.
30xelawalex03 (talk) 16:03, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Sobriety
In a Reddit post, Peter replied that he had been in the process of getting sober. Would that count as a reliable source? 2600:100C:A218:9A7B:69F0:3FC4:DD00:FA7D (talk) 04:10, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- This is addressed by WP:ABOUTSELF; in particular I would consider,
“1. The material [should be] neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim”
. If you think this is the case—as well as all the others on that list—you should add it. — HTGS (talk) 05:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.

