Microbiome has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result November 16, 2021 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 5, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that non-microscopic life forms such as plants associate with microbiomes of microscopic organisms which determine their health and productivity?

This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Microbiology High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Ecology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

As a non-biologist I found the introduction to this article obscure. Like I'll guess most readers I came to the article wanting to find information about the human biome and found only information about a "habitat" and one thing the Wiki article for habitat doesn't enlarge on is the bodies of plants or animals. I found the simpler statement in the Microbiome Journal - "studies of microbiomes colonizing humans, animals, plants or the environment" much easier to comprehend.

Indeed the first mention of "body" is not until the second paragraph of the Definitions paragraph.

Thinking about it, I realise that subconsciously I was making an association between "micro" and "micro-environment" which does not exist. It's right that the article doesn't give the impression that a microbiome only exists in limited areas. However all Wikipedia articles should be accessible to the average reader, particularly the introduction, and many people will be unaware of the rich colonies of microbiota in different parts of the body. They may not read further than the introduction and will therefore be none the wiser.

Could I request the recasting of the introduction to make it clear that the microbiomes of the bodies of animals and plants can be very different to their surroundings. Chris55 (talk) 09:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The paragraph on Antoine Béchamp documents a historically notable 19th-century theory of pleomorphism. Although Béchamp's ideas were ultimately rejected by mainstream biology, they are well-sourced and relevant for understanding historical debates on microbial variability.

Inclusion is consistent with WP:FRINGE and WP:NPOV guidelines: fringe or obsolete scientific theories may be mentioned if they are notable, sourced, and clearly presented as historical context. The section clearly states that Béchamp's model is not part of modern biology, distinguishing historical theory from contemporary microbiome research. Reliable sourcing includes the original work (Béchamp 1912/2020) and secondary scholarly analyses of historical microbiology.

This inclusion does not endorse Béchamp's theory but provides readers with factual context about alternative microbial concepts that preceded germ theory, which shaped the intellectual environment from which modern microbiome science emerged. Moonmaskart (talk) 19:40, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]