Talk:Jason Crow

Concerns over article content

This person is no longer married to Desirae. He is divorced.

70.112.10.178 (talk) 17:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got a source for that? – Muboshgu (talk) 17:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.dropbox.com/s/n78hi0odqqnyvkd/Crow%20Divorce%20Denver%20District.pdf?dl=0 70.112.10.178 (talk) 17:13, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.dropbox.com/s/n78hi0odqqnyvkd/Crow%20Divorce%20Denver%20District.pdf?dl=0
70.112.10.178 (talk) 17:56, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Got a WP:SECONDARY source? Using WP:PRIMARY sourcing is dicey. I don't see anywhere in the filing that the divorce is granted and final (it may say that but I'm not a lawyer). Also, we aren't able to source to files in someone's Dropbox account, as it's on the spam blacklist. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:05, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
can i use primary documentation some other way? 2600:1702:1DF0:6360:5505:D1FD:C9D6:1394 (talk) 16:52, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
any editors have information about this? thanks, high priority. 70.112.10.178 (talk) 23:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
unique situation - no news coverage of the divorce & the court records are sealed to the public. how can we get this changed? 23.228.172.4 (talk) 00:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If there are no public sources whatsoever we have no way of verifying that this document is legitimate. A (public) statement from the subject would be sufficient per WP:ABOUTSELF even if it wasn't in the news, but it would need to be somehow verifiable. i.e. even if you were Crow and asserted that you had gotten divorced on here, we would have no way of confirming that you weren't some random person pretending to be him. Rusalkii (talk) 00:23, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It *may* be possible to just remove the mention of the spouse entirely, without saying that they were divorced, but I would be reluctant to do even that without a better source that a random dropbox link from an IP editor. Rusalkii (talk) 00:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

COI tag (August 2023)

Multiple edits from US Congress IPs; overall sounds like a campaign brochure Rusalkii (talk) 23:22, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have just removed the tag, which is unwarranted. The US Congress IP edits are minimal. If you have specific concerns about what "sounds like a campaign brochure", bring them up. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MOS

What was Jason Crow's primary MOS while serving in the US Army? Was he assigned to the 75th Ranger Regiment and 82nd Airborne Infantry as an Infantry soldier or simply in a support role? If indeed an Infantryman, then why not post his MOS unless he was something else? Just FYI just about every male officer in the Army is or has the opportunity to go to Ranger and Airborne school so just having the tabs is not a true judgement of who or what type of soldier he is or was in any sense, merely another "notch" for his promotion board along with the Bronze star, which by the way are given out like candy to officers just in the AO (Area of Operation) of a combat mission. 47.197.51.241 (talk) 21:01, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.