Talk:Gray code

Well-balanced

An IP editor claims the expressions are different from what's given in the ref. ~Kvng (talk) 13:18, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The number of transition in each dimension is necessarily even. The IP's claim look therefore plausible, while the current claim in the Wikipedia article must be wrong. --FvdP (talk) 15:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lucal code?

I'm not sure why the table of values at the very top of the article also includes a different coding scheme which is not explained anywhere else nor has an article of its own. It makes the table more difficult to read while not adding anything that's related to the article, I suggest it's best removed Ruse.mp (talk) 07:58, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Circumference of hypercube

This edit states that the circumference of a d-dimensional hypercube is 2^d, and cites a source I haven't access to. The statement seems weird to me; 2-dimensional figures (possibly embedded in d dimensions) have perimeters, and for some (cricles and ellipses) they are also called circumferences, but d-dimensional figures do not. There may be a standard way to define something called the circumference of a d-dimensional object, but then we should at the very least wikilink "circumference" to an article with such a definition, and this is not it. Despite the source, I'm inclined to remove the statement. Nø (talk) 08:09, 23 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'll cut that phrase. —Antonissimo (talk) 00:16, 23 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.