Talk:Goodreads
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Goodreads article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 10 months |
integrating criticism section
I cut a bunch of stuff that didn't feel particularly relevant to me. I think we could integrate the criticism section quite effectively into the history section, largely presenting it in tandem with the story of amazon's purchase and abandonment. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:19, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Goodreads rating scale
What is the numerical range of the Goodreads rating scale?
From ratings I've seen on Amazon, it seems to run at least to "5".
I'd appreciate authoritative information on this question.
Thank you.
Nihil novi (talk) 20:25, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Cultural user
In the section on suspensions the term "cultural user" is employed. I presume what was meant was "user of Iranian culture". The problem with that (or any other interpretation I can think of) is that it means nothing. BTW, there *is* a fairly good definition of what culture is (in the anthropological sense), but you won't find that on Wikipedia. The term "cultural user" should be removed from this article.75.117.50.55 (talk) 20:40, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.

