Talk:Gatehouse

St Augustine's Abbey

states : and in 1390 the gatehouse that still survives was built . So 16th century? Aleichem 11:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

London

What about the Temple Bar, London? It's not even mentioned. Thundercloud (talk) 17:25, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Page needs a re-write and the examples are terrible.

None of these are archetypes of the gatehouse. Most are not military examples. Mostly its just a bunch of "stuff". 99.241.105.253 (talk) 00:02, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See above; still no proper definition, systematics (evolution, types)

Any article without a proper definition is close to useless. The user is left to guess. The German Torhaus apparently describes buildings either attached to gates or enclosing them, but the English term is used for complex fortified gate structures of various types which always include the gate passage itself. I have this from interpreting the context in various archaeological articles, which are not covering the whole field anyway, and here we need sources and clear definitions. This page is still just a collection of words & pictures that don't add up to constitute an answer to the basic questions one approaches an encyclopedic article with: what? why? when? how? and so on. Arminden (talk) 21:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.