Talk:Fu Haifeng
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All-time greats
@Stvbastian this source,
https://bwfbadminton.com/news-single/2021/06/15/cai-yun-and-fu-haifeng-indomitable-spirit
"why Cai and Fu were among the all-time greats"
Explicitly states that Cai and Fu are among the all-time greats, thus are considered to be one of the all-time greats of badminton.
Note that this is not your first issue with editing pages. You for example, reverted a Lee Chong Wei edit stating that you don't consider him one of the greatest players of all time because he had no "Olympic golds, world championships" despite multiple high quality sources telling you so, and thus stated you were sure the "good quality" tag from that page would be removed.
If you want to contend an edit, don't simply say "no need to repeat". Contend the source, and explain why. Thus I'm opening this topic up for debate with other badminton editing users:
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.