Talk:Fish ball

Split proposed

To resolve the impasse regarding Cheung Chau fishball, I propose splitting the Hong Kong and Macau section into Hong Kong and Macau fishball (or similar) and merging the aforementioned page into this new page. The fishballs in the SARs of China are notable due to their cultural significance (we use them similar to the Big Mac index in the western world) and there has been civil unrest named after them. @Valereee, what do you think? UKWikiGuy (talk) 07:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me. Valereee (talk) 11:38, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose; Fish ball isn't long enough to warrant a split, it's not at all clear that Hong Kong and Macau fishball is distinct entity, a merge would leave Taiwan hanging as a small and rather isolated section. So, I'd support the consolidation initially proposed (merging Cheung Chau fishball into Fish ball). If we over-look the miscommunication, there seemed to a consensus to merge. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not enough content to justify a split, nor enough sources establishing notability for this as an actually distinct concept. Cheung Chau is a single stall's product and does not warrant its own page so there merge here was appropriate, without the need to split HK in general either. Reywas92Talk 16:09, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noting here that the intervening AfD was to keep and refocus the other article, so there's no need for a split to support the restructure; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheung Chau fishball. Klbrain (talk) 20:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.