Talk:Dan Tan

For the editors, remember not to treat the Daily Mail like a WP:RS; it's not.

For the readers, the DM's coverage of Tan is here, if you're curious now. — LlywelynII 10:30, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that has been one of my mistakes once or twice, thanks for the heads up. Matty.007 12:46, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In this instance it probably shouldn't have been used, but the essay also says "In general, any tabloid newspaper, television show, or site, such as The Sun, The Daily Mirror, The Register, and so on, should not be used when a more respected, mainstream source exists", so I try and bear the last half of the sentence in mind. Thanks, Matty.007 12:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I kept the Invisible Dog ref since it's based in Rome, but suggest just using it for information it's getting from the Italian investigation and court papers and not too much of the "Mr. X" stuff. If any Italian speakers come through and can replace it with Italian court docs or formal newspapers, please do. — LlywelynII 11:49, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This edit established the usage of the page as British English. Kindly maintain it consistently, pending a new consensus. — LlywelynII 10:32, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Dan Tan?

Any thoughts on this? Per the AP and Straits Times, his legal name is his Hokkien one; he's better known in English by the alias Dan Tan, though. Split the difference by staying here? or just go to the common name? — LlywelynII 12:51, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I put it here because he is also often referred to as Dan Tan Seet Eng. Probably best to speak to a native Chinese speaker though. Thanks, Matty.007 13:42, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Moved as uncontroversial bold edit; backed by two main editors of the article. Thanks, Matty.007 13:51, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I actually didn't take a side ^_^ but I think this is good, too: namespace is Dan Tan; start with his actual name; quickly explain where the English name comes in. — LlywelynII 01:38, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for article expansion

That should be enough for now, but some other sources that have additional pieces here or for spin-off articles:

 — LlywelynII 11:46, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Exchange rates

The exchange rates listed follow one source's e100 ($130) gloss but the rate's a little worse now. Also be careful with the Singaporean sources to see if they're using Singaporean dollars or US ones. — LlywelynII 11:47, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dan Tan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:44, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.