Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Filmmaking This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force. Animation: Computer Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Top-importance). Computer graphics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Caprockranger (talk · contribs) / Computer animation Computer animation This user has declared a connection. (COI declared here)

To-do list for Computer animation: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2021-01-14 Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Citing sources : Add inline citations. Use secondary sources if needed. Expand : Describe other 3D animation methods such as morph target animation, fluid simulation, and physically based animation Split : 3D and 2D animation into two different categories instead of being a big mish-mash. Priority * -- 22:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in February 2013. Further details are available here.

Archives (Index)

2023/November

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Hello all - I see that there is a plan to split the article into 2d and 3d animation pages but I have a different idea - given that animation has advanced so much, there is now 1d, 2d, 3d, 4d (yes it exists now), and hybrid. So instead I would like to remove the 2 parts and discuss the coordinate systems and how they make the animation disciplines different. This will also enable us to make the article more specific on the topics which are ubiquitous across, for example, 2d and 3d animation. SnoopLoops (talk) 20:01, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It appears there is a [[]] when there should be something that is being spilt Redbreadwater (talk) 16:31, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it refers to § Splitting 3D and 2D into two different categories here, i will fix this tomorrow, i have to sleep. (deprecated) i woke up now i realized that the topics of 3D and 2D animation want to split into two separate categories as is noted on the article's "To-do list", the result was split and the discussion is closed because it says any user can close so @GothicGolem29: closed and performed the split. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2025-33332-36 (talk) 16:04, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

When are they @GothicGolem29 @RuzzDD @ZacZig @TheMainLogan @Lililolol @jonas going to split the article. I guess it has been more then two years post the discussion. VerdictByLogic - Let's Discuss 12:55, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@VerdictByLogic Hi, I will spill it in the coming hours/days Lililolol (talk) 20:57, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about it, don’t y’all think that the 2D and 3D sections are too short and unsourced to be standalone articles? Lililolol (talk) 21:04, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The same question arose in my mind as well. Therefore, I tagged every user who voted for the split. Regards, VerdictByLogic - Let's Discuss 12:56, 18 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

i personally think made a pretty big impact on animated movies and deserves to be there...but im not smart enough to add it there myself so im asking here Purikaze (talk) 21:05, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please specify, where do you want to add your addition. I mean to say which subtopic etc. Thank you. Regards, VerdictByLogic - Let's Discuss 12:51, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]