Talk:Combrex

Article is Much too Long

It is not clear to me that this database is popular or important enough to warrant a Wikipedia article at all. It is clear, however, that it does not warrant an article of this length (perhaps 1/10th this length or shorter). Also problematic are the facts that this article is highly repetitive, reads like an advertisement for the database, and makes no significant attempt to place combrex into its context among other databases. Unless there is a valid objection, I intend to either nominate this article for deletion or take a crack at dramatically shortening it when I have time to do so. Originalname37 (Talk?) 12:54, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.