This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Firearms Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is undoubtedly one of the worst wiki articles I have ever seen. It seems bad enough that it may have been vandalized. Completely non-descriptive, and even inaccurate, attributing CAR-15 facts to the 933. Should this thing just be deleted? Grizzly chipmunk (talk) 13:45, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing. It's the inadequate remainder after I deleted the material copied from another website.[1][2] (The article was created an editor who's the likely sock of a known plagiarist. I see you've already encountered his handiwork at IMBEL IA2.) There's no good version to go back to. If you put the PROD template on it I doubt anyone would object. Better to start over from scratch, if anyone's interested. Rezin (talk) 23:16, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have no clue what the PROD template is, and I mostly just edit for grammar. That aside, what if this page was completely reconstructed using info from Colt's website, maybe World Guns, and common sense (such as that the 933 model was not available in Vietnam, when Colt models had 6's as primary numbers)? I'll look into fixing this a bit. Grizzly chipmunk (talk) 13:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Better idea. I do not know how to change the name, but it should be Colt M4 Commando, not Colt 933. I will try to find out how to nominate for deletion and recreate the article. Grizzly chipmunk (talk) 13:10, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Colt 933. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110616210348/http://www.colt.com/mil/M4_2.asp to http://www.colt.com/mil/M4_2.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• 6pRjFkL.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:37, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]