Talk:C418

Requested move 11 March 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 01:57, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


– Per WP:COMMONNAME. He is better recognised as C418 than by his real name, by sources and media. Lazz_R 01:03, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding recent reversion about "Rosenfeld possibly no longer contributing to Minecraft"

My edit was reverted because it was "not from a reliable source" -- however, the secondary source I referenced includes direct quotes by Rosenfeld on his own Discord server, thus there was a primary source wrapped inside this secondary source. Rosenfeld's direct quotes include: "listen guys it hurts me as well" "I'm not happy about it but so long and thanks for all the fish" (These were brought up in a conversation about why Rosenfeld was not contributing any new compositions to the game). He also said "yeah, conflict of interest definitely" and "maybe if we stack the lawyers in a pyramid something will happen". @0xDeadbeef please advise as to why such direct quotes are not worthy of documentation on this page and Music of Minecraft. I can see how perhaps including the conjecture about the true nature of the legal issues as being not as reliable, if nothing because it is from a single source, but the non conjecture portion of the addition seems very much noteworthy and definitely reliable (primary source). LMK. Samuuurai (talk) 08:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube is not a generally reliable source, see WP:RSPYT. I personally believe that SalC1 is pretty reliable for their content about Minecraft, but a consensus for this should be reached at WP:RSN first. 0xDeadbeef 08:26, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

C418 never used Trackers?

"It was his brother, Harry Rosenfeld, who introduced him to music composition through Impulse Tracker, commenting that 'even an idiot' can successfully create music with it." Seems to be based off of the website and the minecon panel (I know it's not the guardian source because that says Schism), but like, based purely on those sources alone, it seems a lot like he never used trackers himself (for making music, listening? maybe) and it was only his brother that used it. There's the "idiots" quote, and he's not talking about trackers, his website states: "Now, 11 years ago, there was this moment when my brother excitedly told me that there is this software, Ableton, and even idiots can make music with it. This sounds like a joke, but it’s exactly how it happened. I thought I was sort of an idiot, so I downloaded it and made garbage joke music." He's referring to Ableton, and given the surrounding context it's quite clear that that's in reference to trackers (in his opinion) being not for idiots. MiBenrandon (talk) 07:09, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.