Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

This article is fairly decent in quality, but unfortunately I will have to fail it due to the ongoing edit war.

Reapply once it has been resolved.

Some info on who and were these techniques are used would be interesting. Is this just a North American phenomena or do people in other places do the same?

Ie what is the global impact.

Cheers --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your question, it is currently practiced and written about worldwide, however, there seems to be a lack of quality secondary sources covering that aspect of it in any detail. This has been discussed on the article talk page. That might prevent it from being a Featured Article at this point, but from what I understand would not prevent it from being a Good Article.

The tags, however, obviously are preventing this from being listed as a Good Article, which is why I edit-warred over them. I realize I was wrong to do so, and I hope there is some other way of getting those particular tags forcibly removed. See the (stale) MedCab case, and discussion on the talk page. PSWG1920 (talk) 13:19, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are a number of ways. The best is to go through discussion with the other parties involved. No further GA review however needs to take place until these issues are resolved. Resolving these issues will often improve the article over all though.

On an off note this page seems to be a description of pseudoscience. No evidence for it only evidence against it. This topic is more historical and cultural than anything. --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:39, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]