Talk:Archive

Limitations and alternatives

Added the historian perspective to the issue of the lack of archival sources. I also added an example.– Batili anlamda ilk editor (talk) 15:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: INFO 505 - Foundations of Information Science

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2023 and 11 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Ftalebhaghighi.

— Assignment last updated by Ftalebhaghighi (talk) 22:08, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline

I am intermittently developing a timeline of the various archives on the Archiverdict website ]https://archiverdict.fandom.com/wiki/Archives_timeline here].OR, perhaps, but use or develop if appropriate. Jackiespeel (talk) 11:39, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Computing usage

Can somebody more tech-minded than me clarify or reword the sentence at the end of the lede that runs The computing use of the term "archive" should not be confused with the record-keeping meaning of the term. This article does briefly cover web archiving and "dark archives". The word "archive" is also used in computing as a near-synonym for backup, and hence is used in such technical terminology as archive bit and archive file. But surely in all those cases, as in more traditional usage, the word is being used with broadly the same undertones, to suggest means of ensuring the long-term retention of data that might otherwise be regarded as ephemeral and therefore at risk of destruction. If there's some fine distinction I'm missing, please explain. I'm going to add a "clarify" tag. GrindtXX (talk) 16:29, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.