This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance). Microsoft (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft

Article needs to have brief descriptions of what each release provided.--76.126.182.92 (talk) 08:33, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article should be updated because a lot has happened and the details about the view engines have changes. Razor is now the prefered view engine. Robert Sundström (talk) 22:10, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this statement is no longer accurate, as the wizards now default to the Razor view engines: "By default, the view engine in the MVC framework uses regular .aspx pages to design the layout of the user interface pages onto which the data is composed." 207.156.50.129 (talk) 20:42, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I link the thread title because an editor is apparently unclear what it means. Retitled § appropriately. 72.228.189.184 (talk) 01:35, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Use of the word lightweight.

Subjective? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.237.64.150 (talk) 15:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ASP.NET will be multi-platform since the vNext version.

It will be supported on Mac OS X, Linux and who knows.Shimmy (talk) 10:29, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

System.Web.Mvc.dll references System.Web.WebPages.dll

System.Web.WebPages.dll references Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure.dll

Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure.dll comes with Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure.nupkg package: (Unable to uninstall 'Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure 1.0.0.0' because 'Microsoft.AspNet.WebPages 3.2.3' depends on it)

Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure's source code was not published on CodePlex, it's license is Microsoft EULA.

So, one can't build Asp.NET MVC from sources (or at least he will be forced to bring binary .nupkg with binary code build by third party) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsen.Shnurkov (talk • contribs) 04:59, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding "The source code now resides on CodePlex."

CodePlex has been shot down. The source code probably found a new home.

--Mortense (talk) 08:57, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]