Share to: share facebook share twitter share wa share telegram print page

 

Random generalized Lotka–Volterra model

Example dynamics in the unique fixed point and multiple attractors phases with species. For both simulations . For UFP, ; for MA, .

The random generalized Lotka–Volterra model (rGLV) is an ecological model and random set of coupled ordinary differential equations where the parameters of the generalized Lotka–Volterra equation are sampled from a probability distribution, analogously to quenched disorder. The rGLV models dynamics of a community of species in which each species' abundance grows towards a carrying capacity but is depleted due to competition from the presence of other species. It is often analyzed in the many-species limit using tools from statistical physics, in particular from spin glass theory.

The rGLV has been used as a tool to analyze emergent macroscopic behavior in microbial communities with dense, strong interspecies interactions. The model has served as a context for theoretical investigations studying diversity-stability relations in community ecology[1] and properties of static and dynamic coexistence.[2][3] Dynamical behavior in the rGLV has been mapped experimentally in community microcosms.[4] The rGLV model has also served as an object of interest for the spin glass and disordered systems physics community to develop new techniques and numerical methods.[5][6][7][8][9]

Definition

The random generalized Lotka–Volterra model is written as the system of coupled ordinary differential equations,[1][2][4][10]where is the abundance of species , is the number of species, is the carrying capacity of species in the absence of interactions, sets a timescale, and is a random matrix whose entries are random variables with mean , variance , and correlations for where . The interaction matrix, , may be parameterized as,where are standard random variables (i.e., zero mean and unit variance) with for . The matrix entries may have any distribution with common finite first and second moments and will yield identical results in the large limit due to the central limit theorem. The carrying capacities may also be treated as random variables with Analyses by statistical physics-inspired methods have revealed phase transitions between different qualitative behaviors of the model in the many-species limit. In some cases, this may include transitions between the existence of a unique globally-attractive fixed point and chaotic, persistent fluctuations.

Steady-state abundances in the thermodynamic limit

In the thermodynamic limit (i.e., the community has a very large number of species) where a unique globally-attractive fixed point exists, the distribution of species abundances can be computed using the cavity method while assuming the system is self-averaging. The self-averaging assumption means that the distribution of any one species' abundance between samplings of model parameters matches the distribution of species abundances within a single sampling of model parameters. In the cavity method, an additional mean-field species is introduced and the response of the system is approximated linearly. The cavity calculation yields a self-consistent equation describing the distribution of species abundances as a mean-field random variable, . When , the mean-field equation is,[1]where , and is a standard normal random variable. Only ecologically uninvadable solutions are taken (i.e., the largest solution for in the quadratic equation is selected). The relevant susceptibility and moments of , which has a truncated normal distribution, are determined self-consistently.

Dynamical phases

In the thermodynamic limit where there is an asymptotically large number of species (i.e., ), there are three distinct phases: one in which there is a unique fixed point (UFP), another with a multiple attractors (MA), and a third with unbounded growth. In the MA phase, depending on whether species abundances are replenished at a small rate, may approach arbitrarily small population sizes, or are removed from the community when the population falls below some cutoff, the resulting dynamics may be chaotic with persistent fluctuations or approach an initial conditions-dependent steady state.[1]

The transition from the UFP to MA phase is signaled by the cavity solution becoming unstable to disordered perturbations. When , the phase transition boundary occurs when the parameters satisfy,In the case, the phase boundary can still be calculated analytically, but no closed-form solution has been found; numerical methods are necessary to solve the self-consistent equations determining the phase boundary.


The transition to the unbounded growth phase is signaled by the divergence of as computed in the cavity calculation.

Dynamical mean-field theory

The cavity method can also be used to derive a dynamical mean-field theory model for the dynamics. The cavity calculation yields a self-consistent equation describing the dynamics as a Gaussian process defined by the self-consistent equation (for ),[8]where , is a zero-mean Gaussian process with autocorrelation , and is the dynamical susceptibility defined in terms of a functional derivative of the dynamics with respect to a time-dependent perturbation of the carrying capacity.

Using dynamical mean-field theory, it has been shown that at long times, the dynamics exhibit aging in which the characteristic time scale defining the decay of correlations increases linearly in the duration of the dynamics. That is, when is large, where is the autocorrelation function of the dynamics and is a common scaling collapse function.[8][11]

When a small immigration rate is added (i.e., a small constant is added to the right-hand side of the equations of motion) the dynamics reach a time transitionally invariant state. In this case, the dynamics exhibit jumps between and abundances.[12]

References

  1. ^ a b c d Bunin, Guy (2017-04-28). "Ecological communities with Lotka-Volterra dynamics". Physical Review E. 95 (4): 042414. Bibcode:2017PhRvE..95d2414B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.95.042414. PMID 28505745.
  2. ^ a b Serván, Carlos A.; Capitán, José A.; Grilli, Jacopo; Morrison, Kent E.; Allesina, Stefano (August 2018). "Coexistence of many species in random ecosystems". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2 (8): 1237–1242. Bibcode:2018NatEE...2.1237S. doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0603-6. ISSN 2397-334X. PMID 29988167. S2CID 49668570.
  3. ^ Pearce, Michael T.; Agarwala, Atish; Fisher, Daniel S. (2020-06-23). "Stabilization of extensive fine-scale diversity by ecologically driven spatiotemporal chaos". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117 (25): 14572–14583. Bibcode:2020PNAS..11714572P. doi:10.1073/pnas.1915313117. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 7322069. PMID 32518107.
  4. ^ a b Hu, Jiliang; Amor, Daniel R.; Barbier, Matthieu; Bunin, Guy; Gore, Jeff (2022-10-07). "Emergent phases of ecological diversity and dynamics mapped in microcosms". Science. 378 (6615): 85–89. Bibcode:2022Sci...378...85H. doi:10.1126/science.abm7841. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 36201585. S2CID 240251815.
  5. ^ Sidhom, Laura; Galla, Tobias (2020-03-02). "Ecological communities from random generalized Lotka-Volterra dynamics with nonlinear feedback". Physical Review E. 101 (3): 032101. arXiv:1909.05802. Bibcode:2020PhRvE.101c2101S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.101.032101. hdl:10261/218552. PMID 32289927. S2CID 214667872.
  6. ^ Biroli, Giulio; Bunin, Guy; Cammarota, Chiara (August 2018). "Marginally stable equilibria in critical ecosystems". New Journal of Physics. 20 (8): 083051. arXiv:1710.03606. Bibcode:2018NJPh...20h3051B. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aada58. ISSN 1367-2630.
  7. ^ Ros, Valentina; Roy, Felix; Biroli, Giulio; Bunin, Guy; Turner, Ari M. (2023-06-21). "Generalized Lotka-Volterra Equations with Random, Nonreciprocal Interactions: The Typical Number of Equilibria". Physical Review Letters. 130 (25): 257401. arXiv:2212.01837. Bibcode:2023PhRvL.130y7401R. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.257401. PMID 37418712. S2CID 254246297.
  8. ^ a b c Roy, F; Biroli, G; Bunin, G; Cammarota, C (2019-11-29). "Numerical implementation of dynamical mean field theory for disordered systems: application to the Lotka–Volterra model of ecosystems". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. 52 (48): 484001. arXiv:1901.10036. Bibcode:2019JPhA...52V4001R. doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab1f32. ISSN 1751-8113. S2CID 59336358.
  9. ^ Arnoulx de Pirey, Thibaut; Bunin, Guy (2024-03-05). "Many-Species Ecological Fluctuations as a Jump Process from the Brink of Extinction". Physical Review X. 14 (1): 011037. arXiv:2306.13634. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.14.011037.
  10. ^ Altieri, Ada; Roy, Felix; Cammarota, Chiara; Biroli, Giulio (2021-06-23). "Properties of Equilibria and Glassy Phases of the Random Lotka-Volterra Model with Demographic Noise". Physical Review Letters. 126 (25): 258301. arXiv:2009.10565. Bibcode:2021PhRvL.126y8301A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.258301. hdl:11573/1623024. PMID 34241496. S2CID 221836142.
  11. ^ Arnoulx de Pirey, Thibaut; Bunin, Guy (2024-03-05). "Many-Species Ecological Fluctuations as a Jump Process from the Brink of Extinction". Physical Review X. 14 (1): 011037. arXiv:2306.13634. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.14.011037.
  12. ^ Arnoulx de Pirey, Thibaut; Bunin, Guy (2024-03-05). "Many-Species Ecological Fluctuations as a Jump Process from the Brink of Extinction". Physical Review X. 14 (1): 011037. arXiv:2306.13634. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.14.011037.

Further reading

Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya