Misconduct is wrongful, improper, or unlawful conduct motivated by premeditated or intentional purpose or by obstinate indifference to the consequences of one's acts. It is an act which is forbidden or a failure to do that which is required. Misconduct may involve harm to another person's health or well-being.
Misconduct is of particular importance in professional settings (e.g. lawyers, scientists, doctors, military personnel), in the workplace and various institutions (e.g. schools, hospitals, prisons). Two categories of misconduct are sexual misconduct and official misconduct. In connection with school discipline, "misconduct" is generally understood to be student behavior that is unacceptable to school officials but does not violate criminal statutes, including absenteeism, tardiness, bullying, and inappropriate language.[1] Misconduct in the workplace generally falls under two categories. Minor misconduct is seen as unacceptable but is not a criminal offense (e.g. being late, faking qualifications). Gross misconduct can lead to immediate dismissal because it is serious enough and possibly criminal, e.g. stealing or sexual harassment.
Organizational
Organization and management scholars have paid much attention to the causes, forms, modes of development, and consequences of misconduct within or among organizations.[2] They have studied different types of misconduct, such as white-collar crimes, insider trading, or deceptive accounting.[3][4]Financial misconduct became prominent after the financial crisis of 2007–2008 that revealed how financial organizations can operate profitable illicit activities over decades.[5] Organizational misconduct can involve many organizations that collaborate, such as the case of cartels where firms reduce competition by agreeing on production or pricing, then conceal their actions together and maintain collective secret.
Financial
The failure to understand and manage ethical risks played a significant role in the financial crisis. The difference between bad business decisions and business misconduct can be hard to determine, and there is a thin line between the ethics of using only financial incentives to gauge performance and the use of holistic measures that include ethics, transparency and responsibility of stakeholders. From CEO's to traders and brokers, all-too-tempting lucrative financial incentives existed for performance in the financial industry.
The past widespread financial misconduct led to a call for financial reform. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was passed in 2010 to increase accountability and transparency in the financial industry and protect consumers from deceptive financial practices.[6]
^Greve, Henrich R.; Palmer, Donald; Pozner, Jo-Ellen (2010). "Organizations Gone Wild: The Causes, Processes, and Consequences of Organizational Misconduct". Academy of Management Annals. 4 (1): 53–107. doi:10.5465/19416521003654186. ISSN1941-6520.
^Harris, Jared; Bromiley, Philip (2007). "Incentives to Cheat: The Influence of Executive Compensation and Firm Performance on Financial Misrepresentation". Organization Science. 18 (3): 350–367. doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0241. ISSN1047-7039. JSTOR25146106. S2CID23443477.
^Zahra, Shaker A.; Priem, Richard L.; Rasheed, Abdul A. (2005). "The Antecedents and Consequences of Top Management Fraud". Journal of Management. 31 (6): 803–828. doi:10.1177/0149206305279598. ISSN0149-2063. S2CID146237606.
