Best First Book Award in the History of Religions (2001)
Jason David BeDuhn (born 1963) is an American historian of religion and culture, currently Professor of Religious Studies at Northern Arizona University,[1] and former chair of the Department of Humanities, Arts, and Religion.[2]
Much of BeDuhn's published research relates to Manichaeism, particularly its disciplinary and ritual systems, but also its role as a catalyst in religious history, as well as its distinctive interpretation of Christian traditions related to the teachings of Jesus and Paul. BeDuhn considers that the conversion of Augustine from Manichaeism to Nicene Christianity was not a sudden act but a life-long transformation, with the narrative we now have being the product of Augustine's own idealized retrospect. BeDuhn roots Augustine's dissatisfaction with the Manichaean faith in its practice-focused way of life and external social pressures leading him towards apostasy. The 383 AD law ordered by Flavius Hypatius that condemned anyone who converted from Christianity to Paganism, Judaism, or Manichaeism is cited as one of these strong social pressures.[3]
Beginning with his book The First New Testament: Marcion's Scriptural Canon, BeDuhn has stated that the Gospel of Marcion (called simply 'The Gospel' by adherents of Marcionism) was not produced nor adapted by Marcion of Sinope, but instead adopted by him from a pre-existing gospel text from which he says the Gospel of Luke is also derived.[4][5]
BeDuhn suggests that Luke may be a post-Marcion redaction, but maintains a form of the two-source hypothesis, with Marcion's Gospel interchanged with Luke as the product of a combination of Mark and Q. This differs slightly from Matthias Klinghardt's view that Marcion's gospel was based on the Gospel of Mark, with the Gospel of Matthew based on Mark and Marcion, and the Gospel of Luke expanding on Marcion with reference to Matthew and Mark.[6] These views contrast with assertions of some Church Fathers and the belief of some biblical scholars such as Bruce Metzger and Bart Ehrman that Marcion redacted the Gospel of Luke in accordance with his personal theology.[7][8] Theologian Adolf von Harnack also accepted the view of the Church Fathers that Marcion wished to "purify" the Evangelion to an original state given by Christ and defy the fabricated Gospel of Luke, all without appealing to revelation.[9]
BeDuhn won the Best First Book Award from the American Academy of Religion in 2001 for his book The Manichaean Body in Discipline and Ritual, notable for its analysis of religions as goal-oriented systems of practice rationalized within particular models of reality.[11]
BeDuhn, Jason (1995). The metabolism of salvation: the Manichaean body in ascesis and ritual (Bloomington, Ind., Indiana University, PhD Diss.). OCLC312839137.
Books authored
In 2010 and 2013, BeDuhn published a two-part work entitled Augustine's Manichaean Dilemma in which he considers "the deep imprint of Manicheanism on Augustine".[13][14][15]
BeDuhn, J. (2000). The Manichaean Body in Discipline and Ritual. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN978-0801862700. OCLC51494045.
————— (2003). Truth in Translation: Accuracy and Bias in English Translations of the New Testament. Lanham: University Press of America. ISBN978-0761825562. OCLC52127593.
————— (2010). Augustine's Manichaean Dilemma, 1: Conversion and Apostasy, 373–388 C.E. Divinations. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN978-1283898386. OCLC802048882.
————— (2013). Augustine's Manichaean Dilemma, 2: Making a Catholic Self, 388–401 C.E. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN978-0812207859. OCLC859161485.
————— (2013). The First New Testament: Marcion's Scriptural Canon. Salem, Oregon: Polebridge Press. ISBN978-1598151312. OCLC857141226.
—————; Iain Gardner; Paul Dilley (2014). Mani at the Court of the Persian Kings: Studies in the Cheaster Beatty Kephalaia Codex. Nag Hammadi and Manichaean studies. Vol. 87. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004282629. ISBN978-9004234703. OCLC961532862.
—————; Iain Gardner; Paul Dilley (2018-07-14). The chapters of the wisdom of my Lord Mani. Part III. Nag Hammadi and Manichaean studies. Vol. 92. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV. pp. 343–442 (chapters 321-347). doi:10.1163/9789004363403. ISBN978-9004363366. OCLC1043913619. S2CID166157220.
Books edited
1997 with Paul Mirecki: Emerging from Darkness: Studies in the Recovery of Manichaean Sources. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
2001 with Paul Mirecki: The Light and the Darkness: Studies in Manichaeism and its World. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
2007 with Paul Mirecki: Frontiers of Faith: The Christian-Manichaean Encounter in the Acts of Archelaus. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
2009 New Light on Manichaeism: Papers from the 6th International Meeting of the IAMS. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
^Metzger, Bruce (1989) [1987]. "IV. Influences Bearing on the Development of the New Testament". The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origins, Developments and Significance (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 92–99.
^Adolf von Harnack: Marcion: The Gospel of the Alien God (1924) translated by John E. Steely and Lyle D. Bierma
^Kotzé, A (2014). "Reviewed Work: Augustine's Manichaean Dilemma 2: Making a "Catholic" Self 388-401 C.E. by Jason David BeDuhn". Church History and Religious Culture. 94 (4). Brill: 534–537. doi:10.1163/18712428-09404012. JSTOR43946123.
^Johannes van Oort (2011). "Critical Evaluation of Jason BeDuhn's Augustine's Manichaean Dilemma in Context". Vigiliae Christianae. 65. Brill: 543–567. doi:10.1163/157007211X591830. hdl:2263/19375.