Share to: share facebook share twitter share wa share telegram print page

 

Fundamental laws of the Kingdom of France

This article is about pre-revolutionary France. For modern French constitutional principles, see Fundamental principles recognized by the laws of the Republic. For laws of Francoist Spain, see Fundamental Laws of the Realm.
Grand Royal Coat of Arms of the Kingdom of France

The fundamental laws of the Kingdom of France were a set of unwritten principles which dealt with determining the question of royal succession, and placed limits on the otherwise absolute power of the king from the Middle Ages until the French Revolution in 1789. They were based on customary usage and religious beliefs about the roles of God, monarch, and subjects.

Terminology

Although discussion of the concepts surrounding the idea of fundamental laws which organize the body politic go back to the earliest period of the French monarchy, the expression "fundamental laws" (lois fondamentales) itself didn't come into use until the second half of the 16th century, even though the theories underlying it were fully mature by that point.[1]

The Parliament of Paris as late as 1788 listed a number of rights that it considered fundamental, including that of the ruling house to the throne of France, but also those of the ordinary citizen to never be brought for any matter before judges other than those designated by law, and never to be arrested without being brought before a competent legal authority.[2][a]

Salic law

Further information: Salic law

Early writers in the 9th to the 16th century, such as Smaragdus of Saint-Mihiel, Jonas of Orléans and Hincmar of Reims, saw the king as the embodiment of divine justice, from which he drew his authority.[3]

Salic law was the ancient Frankish civil law code compiled around 500 AD by the first Frankish King, Clovis. Roman Law was written with the assistance of Gallo-Romans to reflect the Salic legal tradition and Christianity, while containing much from the Roman tradition. The text lists various crimes and the fines associated with them.[4] It remained the basis of Frankish law throughout the early Medieval period, and influenced future European legal systems.

The best known tenet of Salic law was the exclusion of women from inheriting thrones, fiefs, or other property. The Salic laws were arbitrated by a committee appointed and empowered by the King of the Franks. Dozens of manuscripts dating from the sixth to eighth centuries and three emendations as late as the ninth century have survived.[5] Its use of agnatic succession governed royal succession in the kingdoms of France and Italy.[citation needed]

Religious limits to power

The absolute monarchy in the kingdom was not the same as totalitarian dictatorship for example, and there were limits on the king's power. These arose chiefly from religious constraints: because the monarchy was considered to be established by divine right, that is, that the king was chosen by God to carry out his will, this implied that the king's subjects should obey and respect him. The king is accountable only to God, but this meant an implicit demand of virtue,[6]

Key themes

While ancient France did not have a constitution in the formal sense (written document containing constitutional rules), it had already developed a constitution in the material sense (organization of power) in the Middle Ages.

The fundamental laws can be grouped into four key themes:[7]

  • customary heredity,[b] imposed through coronation, which replaced election of the king,
  • masculinity (of the sovereign),
  • the gradual distinction between King and State, reflected in the unavailability of the crown and its corollary, the inalienability of the estate,
  • the king's Catholicism, expressly affirmed from the 16th century on; this as a consequence of the Wars of Religion.[7]

In addition, there was also:

  • the prohibition on giving away or selling part of the kingdom,
  • respect for social hierarchies and the pre-eminence of the clergy.[6]

Evolution and demise

Towards the end of the Middle Ages, the monarchy was evolving in the direction of absolutism, placing the king above the law, according to the political ideas of Jean Bodin and his "Six Books of the Republic" of 1576. This implied that with regard to governmental powers, the king makes the laws, the king executes the laws through his ministers and officers, and the king delegates his judiciary power to independent magistrates who handle appeals; nevertheless, the king retains the right to detain anyone of his choice by a lettre de cachet.[6]

Despite this evolution and Bodin's theories, the power of the king remained strictly controlled by traditional institutions, like parliaments, and provincial, parish, and clergy groups, and local customs. Thus, for example, when Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes in 1685, he was acting in response to his entourage, his court, and influential men in the kingdom. The absolute monarchy came to an end in 1789 with the French Revolution.[6]

See also

References

Notes
  1. ^ "The right of every citizen never to be brought before any judge other than his natural judges, who are those designated by law; And the right, without which all the others are useless, of not being arrested, by any order whatsoever, except to be handed over without delay into the hands of judges of appropriate jurisdiction."
    "Le droit de chaque citoyen de n'être jamais traduit en aucune matière devant d'autres juges que ses juges naturels, qui sont ceux que la loi lui désigne; Et le droit, sans lequel tous les autres sont inutiles, celui de n'être arrêté, par quelque ordre que ce soit, que pour être remis sans délai entre les mains des juges compétents."(Maury 1998.)
  2. ^ In law, a custom is a usage held to be obligatory by the social order, as if it were the result of a law. It is formed by the accumulation of precedents.
Citations
  1. ^ Lemaire 1907, p. iii.
  2. ^ Maury 1998.
  3. ^ Les lois fondamentales de la monarchie française d'après les théories de l'ancien régime, by André Lemaire, Aubert Félix, Bibliothèque de l'École des chartes, 1908 69 pp. 663, via Persée
  4. ^ Geary, Patrick (2003). Readings in Medieval History:Rome Law. Canada: Broadview Press Ltd. pp. 129–136.
  5. ^ Drew 1991, p. 53.
  6. ^ a b c d Dignat 2021.
  7. ^ a b Bouscau 2011.

Works cited

Further reading

Modern
  • Guy Augé, Succession de France et règle de nationalité, Paris, D.U.C., 1979.
  • Jean Barbey, Frédéric Bluche and Stéphane Rials, Lois fondamentales et succession de France, Paris, Diffusion Université Culture, 1984.
  • Radica, Gabrielle (2009). "Trois interprétations de la notion de "lois fondamentales" au xviiie siècle [Three Interpretations of the notion of 'fundamental laws' in the 18th century]". Les Lumières en mouvement: La circulation des idées au xviiie siècle [Enlightenment on the move: The circulation of ideas in the eighteenth century]. Lyon: ENS Editions. pp. 229–253. doi:10.4000/books.enseditions.6323. ISBN 9782847887358.
  • Claire Saguez-Lovisi, Les lois fondamentales au XVIII siècle. Recherches sur la loi de dévolution de la couronne, Paris, PUF, 1984.
  • Wood, Ian (2014-06-23). The Merovingian Kingdoms 450 - 751. Routledge. p. 114. ISBN 9781317871156.
Historical
  • Le Songe du vergier, by Charles Louvier, (1360)
  • Traité des ordres et dignités, by Charles Loyseau, 1613
  • Histoire du droit public et ecclésiastique, by René-Louis de Voyer de Paulmy d'Argenson, Germain Louis Chauvelin, 1735
  • Plans des travaux littéraires ordonnés par SM pour la recherche et l'emploi des monuments de l'histoire et du droit public de la monarchie française, by Jacob-Nicolas Moreau [fr], 1782, Imprimerie royale
  • Cérémonial du sacre des rois de France, avec le texte en latin et en français, tel qu'il fut suivi au sacre de Louis XVI (1775), 1931, Éditions Charles Millon
Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya